You said.
That doesn't completely rule out the possibility that the cloning SW isn't fully compatible with ML.
The "test" is to clone ML and verify full function of the clone.
Both Leopard, and Snow Leopard self correct this problem by two methods.
1. Eject the clone, select the application and launch it.
2. Eject the clone and restart. Also repeatedly verified.
Obviously experiences vary based upon not only computer model, but installed software as well.
I have NEVER experienced this problem with Tiger or Leopard regardless of backup clones. (PPC Mac)
I have only seen this happen in Snow Leopard once and it self corrected without any third party software.
Online installation has altered the OS requirements for external application launches in ML.
This is partly due to the introduction of the App Store combined with online installation requirements and Notifications.
The actual Bug itself is a condition where the Launcher updates itself when an external source is mounted, but does not refresh the Launcher when the external device is ejected.
While this works just fine for network connections, it has a bug with respect to hardline devices that contain launchable applications on a GUID formatted drive.
Faulty cloning software that duplicates a clone with identical UUID that cannot be mounted at the same time as the source is ludicrous since this makes the clone perfectly useless to anyone but a criminal pirate and the flaw in the cloning software IS effectively a form a malware that caused the operating system to function improperly.
This particular thread is from users who have all experienced the identical problem with minor variations experienced between actual machines and installed applications.
That is to be expected.
It should be noted that my posts have all been made with specific reference to a Mac Pro mid 2012 AND NO OTHER.
There aren't very many Mac Pro mid 2012 users, and numerous ML users who do not have or use a Mac Pro mid 2012. The vast majority of Mac Pro users are Mac Pro mid 2010 users and these machines do Not share the same firmware. (the Mac Pro mid 2012 firmware IS specific to that machine ONLY, so Yes, there IS something else involved with my three month old machine that is fully functional, it is unique)
The techniques I specified Do work on a Mac Pro mid 2012, but curiously enough, not "always", so I included the Terminal method as well.
Why doesn't it work "always"?
Because it is an operating system bug that is modified by its Launcher refresh and alters its state depending on application installs and recent network connections.
To be specific, my Repair Disk Permissions works very well if I have made no internet connection or network connections or application updates between clone backups.
Therefore, symptoms WILL vary.
Since there is No Permanent Fix, since MANY have experienced the problem, it IS an operating system bug.
All the while.... one must ask self.... how many users actually use the "open with" option versus those who simply double click and may not be aware of the problem at all????
Since it is only an ANNOYANCE it may be best to ignore it until Apple fixes it permanently.
As far as YOUR experiences go, it may be useful to specify what machine you are using, and what cloning software you use. (if any)
OR... do you intend to replace your entire operating system and applications with brand new installs WHEN (not if) your hard drive fails.
If so, best set aside a couple days because you will be making many customer service calls because most new professional software requires online activation and will only allow you to activate once regardless if it is the same machine. (the problem with Time Machine is obvious, its just files)
More importantly.... if you have not experienced this problem, "WE" all want to know why and why so many have had this problem. (actually an annoyance)
For example, is your Time Machine backup GUID or APM?, is it Journaled?
Do you use multiple internal hard drives?
Can you use multiple internal non partitioned hard drives?
What version of ML are you using?.... and on and on and on....
(as far as Time machine users experiencing this problem, I have only seen one report, so it may be a fluke)
Personally (as if it matters) I solved the problem permanently by switching to Snow Leopard.
Since then.... I have not had one single problem with "duplicate open with" on a Mac Pro mid 2012 that did not self correct After The Clone Was Ejected. (proper operation should have "duplicate open with" until after the duplicate is ejected)
Arguing what I or any other has or has not experienced first hand, does not make the experience vanish from reality.
This is a technical forum where people share what they have experienced.... this is not a debating forum where people argue or assert psycho babble excrement.
All who have made these posts, have experienced a similar problem.
Is it technically rational to demand that ALL symptoms be perfectly identical among machines that are not identical?
Seems that all evidence says NO.
All majority consistent evidence involves those wise enough to make backup clones.
Evidence clearly indicates that this Bug is dynamic, not static.
Simply seek the parts of the OS that are dynamic to isolate the problem. (Launcher refresh)
Did You Know....
A similar refresh problem exists in your Network Settings?
To "prove this" you will need to monitor the HARDWARE transceivers and ignore the User GUI.
In short.... the GUI will indicate all hardware transceivers disabled, the hardware IS enabled upon wake up, and restart despite network settings and is Only Disabled when you Manually Refresh the Network Settings.
A Refresh problem no different than the "duplicate open with" bug.
A SERIOUS problem for those of us who are classified. (Apple concedes that this problem exists but has chosen to define it as Too Rare to repair since most customers want their network tranceivers automatically activated)
I conceded that it was rare, but then asked the obvious.
Why doesn't my GUI indicate that the transceivers have been automatically enabled?
The GUI on ALL computers is supposed to ACCURATELY tell the User the state of the computer hardware and this has always been a fact.
At that point my assigned case number was defined as "closed".
Since this "duplicate open with" problem is not affecting function.... what will Apple's response be?
Will it be.... not "everyone" has reported this problem?