HVX200 vs. SDX900 -- for FILM LOOK edited in FCP

What are the latest thoughts on relative strengths & demerits of the two cameras, for shooting movies to edit in FCP, then output to tape & DVD, as well as projection and blowups? It seesm to be a hotly contested question, and the more opinions I can tally the more I learn. - THANKS!

G5 Mac OS X (10.0.x)

Posted on Apr 2, 2006 6:19 PM

Reply
3 replies

Apr 2, 2006 6:27 PM in response to todd crespi

you're really asking for a comparison of apple and kiwis here.

sdx900 - dv25/dv50, native 16:9 aspect ratio, interchangeable lens, efp/eng chassis
hvx200 - dv25/dv50/dvcpro HD, native 16:9 and mediocre glass, compact camcorder chassis

i would think a more suitable comparison would be between the sdx and hdx400 but what do i know. if you ask me it's not really the equipment that matters as much as the operator and the story being told.

Apr 2, 2006 6:57 PM in response to Zebulun

Zebulun - I certainly agree with your point about the sensibility and skill of the operator being the main issue.. (I'm sure Rembrandt could paint very well with amateur brushes). At the same time, though, I want to research this as thoroughly as possible. One controversy is the SDX's ability to look filmic yet sharp when blown up. Some say true HD looks far better, while others debate that vigorously. One discussion on the Panasonic site got so rancorous the moderator closed down the thread! - Anyhow. Thanks for your input. I'm inclined toward the SD beause of workflow and bigger size of the camera.

G5 Mac OS X (10.0.x)

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

HVX200 vs. SDX900 -- for FILM LOOK edited in FCP

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.