I disagree. Apple has added many, many features to iTunes over the years that target the power user. From smart playlists, to obscure things like ID3 tag version control. Power users features are sprinkled throughout iTunes. And to say that Apple doesn't have a "specific committment to produce a certain style product" is true, but also fairly obvious/meaningless.
If it is true then why is it meaningless?
Soundjam has ID3 tag version capability, and so does iTunes 2.0.4. I have both open right now on my computer. It certainly isn't a newer version of iTunes introduction.
Basic music playing has changed a LOT. You couldn't even rate your tracks in the beginning.
Rating isn't a feature of playback but of tagging. They have also removed some things. SJ had an alarm clock. It had a stream broadcaster. My version of iTunes has internet stream buffering settings, which I think are gone in newer versions. I don't think they have added anything in terms of actual music playback from iTunes 7.5 to 10.7 except this DJ thing people are mentioning and I don't think I have heard about here before so it must not be used much (or nobody ever has problems with it). All the new things I see reported here have to do with syncing and iTunes purchases. Yes, movie playback was added, but wasn't that at the same time they started selling movies on the iTunes Store, supporting my thesis about recent improvements basically being marketing associated?
This is simplified to point of meaninglessness. There's an interaction between customers and product design teams. It may not be obvious from the outside, but there's still a give & take. What you're saying is in essence is, "Shut up and accept whatever happens," which is not a rational approach.
Justify your stating it is meaningless. Your arguments are simplistically dismissive.
Yes, iTunes accepts customer feedback. I know about Appleseed. You can give. They do not have to take. You do not have to shut up and accept it. You can complain. If they don't change things to your liking you can go and buy a PC. Those are your choices. My basic statement is any profit making corporation is going to optimize their market. If they decide that in order to simplify their software for the mass consumer (many of whom can barely understand the on/off switch on a computer) they need to get rid of things a very small percentage of power users want (I dont' see a huge number of smart playlist questions here), well guess which way they will go?
iDVD is not a good comparison, because of the vastly different switching costs. I used iDVD, but was fairly unaffected by its slow demise.
I'm not understanding "switching costs". There's nothing to switch. Well, maybe if they want to keep it compatible through the next couple of OS updates, but that's not what I was thinking. They simply pulled it off the market. This wasn't a slow demise. It wasn't gradually recoded into nothingness. It was here in one version of iLife, gone in the next. And I bet there are more grandparents out there that can just about manage a DVD but have no idea about a computer for watching movies that still make iDVD desirable than there are DJs needing some feature on iTunes. Apple could just put the old version of iDVD up on its Mac app page. From the number of requests for iDVD I see on the forums I think Apple cound have kept it for sale for much longer without any real extra effort, but for some reason best known to them they decided not to. And it's not like there's a ready replacement.