pvonk wrote:
Well, you do have a point. I overextended the OP's desires. FWIW, I do have both sugarsync and dropbox, but my reliance on DB is based on iOS. If that doesn't enter into the equation, then yes, SL would be a good service to use.
Dropbox offers a small fraction of SugarSync's functions. For example:
I synchronize my entire home folder to it, I use 3 computers regularly (an Air, an MBP and an iMac). I can take the Air to work, work on it all day, at home I simply open the iMac and all of the work I did on the Air that day is on the iMac waiting to be completed, or on the MBA if I choose to use that because my wife is monoplizing the iMac. I can choose to have copies of my work archived at any time in the archive provided. If I drop the Air down the stairs I can buy another, connect it to Sugarsync and in a reasonable time span all of the work from the old one is on the new one. If I choose to include my phone (any phone not just an iphone) in this group I can.
And of course I can share a folder (or 2 or 1000) exactly as DropBox can, but without DropBox's size limits or annoying insistence in having those files in its own folder rather than the one I want it in.
And there is much more, perhaps you should look again.