Hey everyone. Being that I'm migrating from many years of Windows, I know that Windows laptops don't compare to Windows desktops in any way, shape, or kind. Windows laptops are just generally much slower than any desktop, and often get slower by the minute. I was wondering, is this the same situation with Apple laptops, specifically the MacBook Pro? How does the MacBook Pro with, let's say, 1.5 GB of RAM, and 2 GHz processor compare to an iMac with the same. As you can see (via my signature), I'm currently on the 20" iMac (2 GHz, 1.5 GB of RAM). Is the MBP anywhere near the performance of an iMac, or any Apple desktop for that matter? Thank you in advance.
20" iMac (Intel Core Duo) 2 GHz 250 GB HD, 1.5 GB RAM & 128 MB vRAM, Dual-boot,
Mac OS X (10.4.6),
30 GB Black iPod with video, .Mac account - anthonykid@mac.com, Male
If you get comparable configurations, specifically a 7200 RPM disk on the MacBook Pro and the same amount of RAM, then yes, they'll exhibit comparable performance. They both have essentially the same hardware for all the key computing elements (CPU, FSB, ICH, MCH). The real reason these are some of the fastest machines available in consumer computing equipment is the 667 MHz Front-Side Bus (FSB). That's shared by both designs. And, of course, they have comparable CPU speeds and are both dual core.
The biggest difference is the size of the hard drive. Other than than it would be a personal decision between portablility and bigger screen and storage.
also, the imac performs better in most games 1-2 fps whn it has the 256 MB video card, because iMacs have a desktop version of the x1600 than the MBP, but its not a big difference
This thread has been closed by the system or the community team.
You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.
MPB vs. iMac?
Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.