etresoft wrote:
snowshed wrote:
If you would like, I can post a not-so-hypothetical situation/condition of what I want to do.
That would be ideal.
As I do not know where you live... I live in the Rocky Mountains in Colorado, USA. Long ago, I became fascinated with the history of early railroads, and where they were built in the mountains throughout the state. And with the history of some of the areas where the railroads penetrated, prospered, and were abandoned. (Here's a very recent hike: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/j881fp0m72w8u1e/jLMjIbA-f3)
I've been going to various websites, and collecting screenshots of historic photos of different areas for personal use. No commercial uses, such as books, postcards, etc. And these photos are organized into folders, sometimes by location (Denver, London, Paris, Moscow, etc.), sometimes by subject (railroads, airplanes, boats, etc.). But many of the photos may contain things, items, etc, that are common to all hard drive folders. A photo of a steam locomotive in Denver, a Denver and Rio Grande train in Aspen, Colorado in 1892, etc.
So I have photos that have steam locomotives included in the photos spread across the hard drive under different categories. And the name of the files usually have no mention of a steam locomotive being in the photo.
What I would like to find, for both OS X and Windows, is a utility or program for both OS's that performs the following function, and ideally adds or patches the function to the OS, not a standalone application.
Since OS X does not have an equivalent function to Libraries in Windows, I'm going to use "library" to represent the target location(s).
In a folder on the hard drive, I have a photo of Aspen, Colorado. In the photo is a steam locomotive belonging to the the Denver and Rio Grande Railroad.
I create 5 libraries, each displayed in a window. The libraries are called Mining, Railroads, Aspen, Denver and Rio Grande, and Steam Locomotives. These are the target locations. And, I open the source folder that has the photo I just mentioned. Drag the photo from the source folder to each library. The OS/patch/program automatically creates a shortcut/alias to that photo in each library. Just 5 operations on the user's end. Done!
Using shortcuts/aliases, 10 operations in Windows, at least 11 for Snow Leopard (since there's no Move command in SL.) Now, repeat for 100 photos. How much extra work for the user, to do mundane operations that computers are far more efficient at doing?
What if you had 5,000 files you wanted to do this with? I don't, but my brother-in-law would love this, and he's got terabytes of photos. He's always searching his hard drives for a picture of this or that. He knows he has them, just not where. While some photo programs will do what I've just asked about, AFAIK you can't add PDF's, various office documents, CAD drawings, music files, or even URL's. If all of these types of files and others could be shown/listed in one place, at the OS level, how much easier would it be for the user?
Since the photos are all screenshots, I see no way for tags to exist that describe what's in the photo, unless the user manually adds that data. If the tags don't exist, how will any search using Spotlight or Windows Desktop Search find the photos?
I poked around a bit in the internals of Spotlight and it is possible to search multiple folders simultaneously with a little of editing in TextWrangler.
But, that is not something the average user can do. Not a practical solution. And far above my abilities.
Gut feeling for me is, computers are not getting more powerful, making the job easier for the user overall. Just diminishing the power so smaller devices can be used.
Overall feeling is, we are just reinventing the wheel, treading water. đ