Limnos wrote:
The original poster's profile is confusing since it says "Mac Pro" which is an Intel Mac, and "G5" which is is a PPC Mac. Unless the profile lists multiple machines it is contradictory. If it is indeed a G5 then Sheepshaver is not an option. [clip]
A dual 2.3 GHz G5 is obviously not a Mac Pro, even though the OP calls it such. (OP probably is referring to the external chassis tower configuration which is similar to the Mac Pro.)
Sheepshaver is in fact an option on a PPC PowerMac; I have installed and run Mac OS 9.0.4 on my 2.7 GHz dual-CPU (early 2005) PPC PowerMac with Mac OS 10.5.8.
The purpose of Sheepshaver is to provide a Classic Mac OS which will run on versions of Mac OS X which no longer support that OS. It is apparently written in Universal Binary which allows operation under both PPC and Intel Macs. I did have problems running game apps using Sheepshaver, although they opened with no problem and would play video/audio correctly. Problem was that the games froze intermittently, so I opted to go back to 10.4.11 with Classic installed, where there are no problems with the games.
I agree that the current e-Bay/Amazon prices for Leopard are outrageous; my copy of 10.5 cost $104 with tax. I found it not worth the "upgrade," since its additional features do not compensate me for the slower operation and loss of Classic.