MixedUp wrote:
thanks Luis - memory ordered! Mind if I ask:
(a) re "on a 2010 machine" - do you have any experience re what sort of level of improvement jumping to a 2013 MacBook Pro 15" 2.6GHz would have? (say after moving to optimized video)
I wish I had that experience... I do not have access to a recent MBP, I can only hear people say how fast it is.
I suspect that, especially for HD, the difference may be significant, but I can only guess. Of course, several factors are in play. If you upgrade you will also need a fast drive to really take advantage of your new mac.
(b) my internal non-SSD drive is 500G, however I could upgrade that to a 1TB drive. But after returning with heaps of gopro video (which is scary I know) about 150GB, this means there's a good chance if I import it in with full optimization it will potentially not fit on the 1TB internal drive. What are the options here. What comes to mind is:
* using proxy option - however from what I'm reading it seems you might lose a bit of quality
* use an external drive - however over USB I assume this would not be fast enough for editing? I note my external USB drive doesn't even turn up as a option under FCPX to import videos to
* do many culling of the videos first, or edit in batches - I guess this might be the best?
* still would have been nice to have an option that just lets me buy a large external drive & not have to worry about culling etc?
Using proxy for editing does NOT mean that you will be stuck with lower quality video. Proxy is small (roughly a quarter the size of optimized), which both saves drive space and makes editing much faster.
If you do export from proxy, quality will be lower, but you don't have to. Just edit in proxy and before you export, switch in the Preferences to "Original/Optimized". You'll get the full quality output without the need to generate optimized media.
An external drive may be hindered by a slow connection like USB2, but that will depend on the complexity and size of your edits; proxy is a big help there too. It really depends on the editing you do.
In my case, I have the benefit of owning a 17" with the express card slot, so I bought an e-sata card and e-sata external drive. This is about three times as fast as USB2 would allow. Actually, the hard drive itself becomes the bottleneck, not the e-sata connection. With Thunderbolt, it would be similar, the drive being the bottleneck; you'd be well served by a disk array. With a new mac, USB3 might be an option worth considering, too, though how well it works with video is still a bit of an unknown.
In your current machine, I think that the internal is probably faster, and space is the key consideration. My projects are small, so if I were editing in your configuration, I'd keep the current project and events in the internal to edit, and move the finished ones to externals (plural - don't neglect backing up...)