D3us wrote:
DMC440 wrote:
Sounds promising, Coorabin.
They said that the MBP model is notorious for heating up when under load, such as doing my video editing and playing video games, and that while they hoped this repair would be the fix I was looking for it depended greatly on what I was using the computer for. In other words it was likely to happen again if I continued to work that GPU and get the computer really hot.
So, not fit for purpose. A serious design shortcoming. Any disagreement. Anyone?
I really still don't understand why laptops, be it pc or mac, are sold/bought for video editing (or gaming).
It's asking for trouble.
A laptop/macbook will, even if they seem to have same cpu/gpu/whatever, allways be slower as it are trimmed for mobility components. This means lower power = slower working.
Yet, they still get hotter under load and fail more often then their desktop versions.
Had a customer this week looking around for a video editing system.
He was asking around about laptops/macs for it too when shopping.
And was told/advised they are fit for the job.
He prefers to buy from me as I serviced his compurters allready before, but knows I don't like to sell laptops..
Told him nope, I won't sell you a portable, pc or macbook, for video edting.
Also showed him this thread... his mind was made up again pretty soon....
Now he will get a pretty high-spec desktop which he can expand further later if needed.
I have clients in your industry here in the UK and to an extent I agree with you - for the occasional heavy video work I do I wouldnt dream of using my late 2011 to do it when I have an 8 core 3.2 Mac Pro 3,1 which though slower single core is faster than my MBP mulitcore it most certainly isnt but more importantly can cope with heavy tasks with aplomb. I have broadcast clients who grew impatient for the 6th gen Mac Pro used iMacs as a substitute who had very high failure rates due to the high amount of heat build up and if not for Applecare would have gone through 3 or 4 logic boards over the 3 years. Now they have new Mac Pro cans, it's the iMacs and not the classic Mac Pro Towers that are being delegated light duties now and the old cheesegraters, some six years old like mine are still going strong. For very heavy work the new Mac Pro thermally is really something else, the quietest workstation I have ever (not) heard rendering.
Though back to the semi pro arena which I think a MBP is and should be capable - like you I believe it's just our particular 2011 generation that suffers from this issue - excessive heat due to much larger CPU and GPU than originally envisaged when this chassis was designed in 2008 and the lead free solder exemption ending. The long term fix I believe of replacing with a new GPU lead soldered, heatsinks polished and optimally thermally pasted does dissipate the heat far more efficiently allowing less build up in and around the logic board where the GPU and CPU sit sorts this problem out. The 2012 models use far cooler Ivy Bridge CPU and Nvidia GPU which means the design can cope better and the retinas use a far larger, more thermally efficient cooling layout to dissipate all the heat. I also have clients using older unibody models running snow leopard with FCP7 still going strong too which have only required new thermal paste every 2-3 years or so.
If Apple wont provide what I believe is a permanent fix all I do ask is they reimburse me the cost of getting mine fixed properly, for less cost than a depot repair and far less downtime for me having to go back to Apple again and again with the same flawed boards being offered as a 'solution'!