Some observations on your post which may take the shine off that apple you seem to be furiously polishing. With the caveat that I, too, have had a positive experience with the company and won't be turning my back on them anytime soon. That said...
Marianco1 wrote:
After 3 years of heavy use, my primary MacBook Pro’s (early 2011 with 1920x1200 glossy display) GPU started failing in the same way as described in this thread.
Many complainants on this thread have had their machines fail due to this issue well shy of the three year mark.
Apple’s Flat Rate Repair Program is one of Apple’s HIDDEN BARGAINS For a flat rate of $310 before taxes, Apple will replace ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING in your Mac that is not functioning to spec. This includes parts AND LABOR. You won’t have to pay a tech $75 to $150 an hour for their services. The labor is essentially free. This is a tremendous bargain.
I haven't investigated this in my native Australia but some posts indicate that this bargain is only available in the US and many of the users here are elsewhere in the big, wide world.
For those who expect Apple to repair FOR FREE their out-of-warranty Macs: this will never happen.
Yes it can. They did for me and some others on this thread. It depends on how you approach the problem, who you deal with and whether you have good consumer laws in your country.
This is a bad attitude of entitlement.
No. It's an expectation that a premium machine will last for a reasonable period of time, outlasting a warranty period. And that when a plethora of virtually identical symptoms occur in a specific generation of machine, the manufacturer will accept that there is an endemic problem and be honourable enough to acknowledge it and assist in remedying it.
In 2011 Apple sold 2.75 million laptops. About 200,000 of these were the MacBook Pro 17” model. About 100,000 were the early 2011 model. Obviously Apple has not declared a recall because the vast majority of the MacBook Pro 17” early 2011 model are not affected by the GPU defect.
On what data do you base that assertion? It's a total assumption on your part: some people don't complain; some accept the failure and buy a new machine. You may use sweeping statistical inferences to make a point and so can I: The 6000+ posts here obviously don't correlate to 6,000+ disgruntled owners, but many of them will have contributed to another website (unnamed for fear of this post being removed) whose individual names total over 5,500. I read that 1 in 26 people complain. That would suggest their are 143,000+ problem MacBook Pros out there. That is all as unverifiable as your "vast majority", but makes the point.
Additionally, most of the complainants here have 15" machines, if you read all the posts. In fact, when I took my ailing 17" Pride-And-Joy to the Apple Store, the Genius - who professed to being aware of the issue, or at least the reporting of it online - asserted that it was only affecting 15" machines, as the 17" had a different logic board and chipset.
Even for Apple’s free replacement programs - where Apple determines that a product is defective - the free replacement is only good for a limited time. Generally, this time limit is the same as an AppleCare Warranted product. For example, for the Graphic Card Replacement program for the Mid-2011 27-inch iMac, Apple will only replace the graphics card if the iMac was brought in within 3 years of the original sale date of the Mac.
Again, where is your source for this assertion? Giving an example does not make it the rule. Apple recalled five year old iPods about three years ago and there are other examples of recalls outside Applecare limits.
When a product is out of warranty, it is common sense that in the absence of a recall, the owner of the product bears the responsibility for repair.
Agreed. If the failure is an isolated incident. But this is a widespread issue for which we are seeking a recall. Have you actually read this thread in detail?
The techs at Apple closely examined my MacBook Pro and repaired it at a high level similar to how Lexus’s mechanics always try to repair to perfection.
I'm sorry, what? Were you observing the repair being undertaken? How could you possibly know it was repaired "at a high level"? We have numerous accounts here about misdiagnosis, repair or replacement of parts unnecessarily, and more than a sneaking suspicion that logic board replacements have been done with second-hand stock.
Aside from all the above, what you completely fail to recognise is the underlying technical issue which means that, in all probability, your as-good-as-new, flat-rate, Lexus-quality-repaired MacBook Pro will fail again with the same issue.