Want to highlight a helpful answer? Upvote!

Did someone help you, or did an answer or User Tip resolve your issue? Upvote by selecting the upvote arrow. Your feedback helps others! Learn more about when to upvote >

Newsroom Update

Final Cut Pro transforms video creation with Live Multicam on iPad and new AI features on Mac. Learn more >

Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

What Mac is the best for the money, Core i7 iMac or a base model Mac Pro?

Here is my situation:


My school has a six year life cycle for macs, and we have a 2006 Mac Pro (1,1) that is reaching the end of its useful life. I had recently tried Final Cut Pro X and it pains me to say that it took 4 hours to export a 14 minute 720p video. This mac is used for our school news and has to be a beast video editing machine. We have been saving money for quite some time and can now afford a decent upgrade.


So my question to you is which would be the best upgrade for the money: a 21.5 inch iMac with an i7, 8gb RAM, and Fusion drive or the cheapest Mac Pro with after market SSD?


I am looking for something that would really power through Final Cut Pro X and be able to usefully last us another 6 years.

Please help I am forever perplexed with this!

Posted on Feb 2, 2013 12:13 PM

Reply
Question marked as Best reply

Posted on Feb 2, 2013 12:55 PM

I think it was in the last keynote where Apple said the current iMac with fusion drive is the fastest machine for FCPX.


The MacPro will be given up or we will get a huge performance update to surpass the new iMacs. Both is possible.


You never go wrong with an iMac. It's also a perfect time to buy an iMac since the new ones are just out.

I'm still working on a late 2009. I wouldn't need 4 hours to export 14 minutes of a 720p video (of course this depends of the effects and filters you use).

13 replies
Question marked as Best reply

Feb 2, 2013 12:55 PM in response to cnelson3225

I think it was in the last keynote where Apple said the current iMac with fusion drive is the fastest machine for FCPX.


The MacPro will be given up or we will get a huge performance update to surpass the new iMacs. Both is possible.


You never go wrong with an iMac. It's also a perfect time to buy an iMac since the new ones are just out.

I'm still working on a late 2009. I wouldn't need 4 hours to export 14 minutes of a 720p video (of course this depends of the effects and filters you use).

Feb 2, 2013 1:18 PM in response to cnelson3225

The cheapest Mac Pro would not be very fast. The i7 iMac would definitely be faster but I would really recommend ordering additional ram to the iMac when it's purchased because it is very difficult to add it afterward, and FCP X would run much smoother with more than 8 gb.


If you get it with a fusion drive, just run your operating system on the fusion and not your events and projects. If I had to choose between extra ram and a fusion drive for fcp x performance, I would get the ram.

Feb 2, 2013 11:11 PM in response to cnelson3225

I was a tech manager for a large high school for several years and I believe if I were in your situation I would absolutely get an iMac because the value of the current iMac line as compared to the MacPro is so high. Unless you throw a lot of money at a MacPro, the iMac is going to be a much faster machine.12 cores and a top end vid card on a MacPro will, I think, get you better performance but at a huge cost. If you could wait till the next round of MacPro come out it may be a different thing but you still have a big investment in a box that will begin to decline quickly whereas with the imac you can wait a year or two and replace it with a new one. I would personally recommend a 2011, 27" refurb with SSD and i7 processor. Only pay for the 4GB ram and throw 16 more in and you're in great shape. Add some external storage and boom! For school use I'd stay away from Fusion or any internal HD in an iMac just for the sake of reliability and all the student work should be on external anyway. I have a MacPro 1.1 and an iMac and am so very sad the MacPro line required Video cards that had (for most consumers) to be Apple specific. End of rant. Grab an iMac and replace it in two years and don't look back.

Feb 3, 2013 1:18 PM in response to digibudII

This really helps me a lot, however it is no just replace it in a couple years... Unless our own class raises the money, the replacement cycle is every six years. That's what worries me. We have a lab of 2011 or 2010 Core i3 iMacs and they seem just as quick in the heavy applications as the original Mac Pro. As far as getting a souped up one of those I am waiting on a response from the district if they can purchase previous model years. If we can, and knowing our replacement cycle, and the fact that we may not be able to open it up and put an SSD into it, do you still think we should get the older one?

What Mac is the best for the money, Core i7 iMac or a base model Mac Pro?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.