Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

SSD vs Fusion vs HD

Does anybody have actual read/write speeds among the internal drives of the mac mini?

If one needs to read or write large files to these drives how much of a speed difference are we talking about?


When you go configure your mac mini for purchase it claims that the SSD is 4 times faster than the 5400 rpm drive but no actual numbers are given.

I am sure boot up time will be faster but what about read and write times?

iMac 27, Mac OS X (10.6.8), 2.8Ghz Intel Quad Core i7 / 8GB / 1TB

Posted on Feb 5, 2013 7:52 PM

Reply
Question marked as Best reply

Posted on Feb 6, 2013 2:01 PM

I received a new Mac mini at work 3 weeks ago which has the Intel i7 processor and the 256GB SSD in it. I absolutely love it! I am using it with my old 30" Apple Cinema Display via an adaptor that was purchased with the Mac mini and it works great.


Since I have only used this Mac mini in one configuration, I cannot compare it with Mac minis that have a standard HD in it or one that has a Fusion drive. That being said, this Mac mini absolutely flies for disk access activities. I have a 2-year old MacBook Pro at home with Aperture in it 4GB RAM, and an i7 processor with the standard 500GB HD. I use my Mac mini purely for work, but as a test, I recently loaded 30 raw image files (averaging around 35MB each, IIRC) on it and those files loaded in little more than an eye blink whereas I had to wait about 10 minutes or so for them to load on my MBP at home. I installed Aperture on my Mac mini and the photos loaded in it near instantenously whereas at home, it waks a minute or two for each photo to load (same images).


I am an amateur photographer so I do a lot of photo work at home on my MBP. This Sunday morning, I am joining several other photographers to do a photo shoot at the Philadelphia Zoo, which is only a few miles from my office, so I am going to try editing those photos on my Mac mini. I expect to have at least 250 raw image files and editing that many photos at home on my MBP easily takes me an hour, but I expect to be able to edit them in significantly less time in my office on my Mac mini.

6 replies
Question marked as Best reply

Feb 6, 2013 2:01 PM in response to OzziesMAC

I received a new Mac mini at work 3 weeks ago which has the Intel i7 processor and the 256GB SSD in it. I absolutely love it! I am using it with my old 30" Apple Cinema Display via an adaptor that was purchased with the Mac mini and it works great.


Since I have only used this Mac mini in one configuration, I cannot compare it with Mac minis that have a standard HD in it or one that has a Fusion drive. That being said, this Mac mini absolutely flies for disk access activities. I have a 2-year old MacBook Pro at home with Aperture in it 4GB RAM, and an i7 processor with the standard 500GB HD. I use my Mac mini purely for work, but as a test, I recently loaded 30 raw image files (averaging around 35MB each, IIRC) on it and those files loaded in little more than an eye blink whereas I had to wait about 10 minutes or so for them to load on my MBP at home. I installed Aperture on my Mac mini and the photos loaded in it near instantenously whereas at home, it waks a minute or two for each photo to load (same images).


I am an amateur photographer so I do a lot of photo work at home on my MBP. This Sunday morning, I am joining several other photographers to do a photo shoot at the Philadelphia Zoo, which is only a few miles from my office, so I am going to try editing those photos on my Mac mini. I expect to have at least 250 raw image files and editing that many photos at home on my MBP easily takes me an hour, but I expect to be able to edit them in significantly less time in my office on my Mac mini.

Feb 6, 2013 6:53 PM in response to Stanley Horwitz

Thanks for reply, and I assumed that it would be quick.

What I am really seeking is how fast are the actual read/write times when compared to external thunderbolt drives.


Most external drives have published read/write times, and lot of those numbers are tested with third party software. I have yet to actually see numbers on the internal SSD on the mac minis and I am curious. If I used it as a server and needed to upload a large file would it be faster if the file was stored in the internal SSD or an external thunderbolt LaCie drive?

Feb 6, 2013 9:12 PM in response to OzziesMAC

Even when you consider the speed of the Thunderbolt bus, SSD will always be faster than a spinning disk. You will not find many detailed stats on the parts used in any Mac...even though they're all off the shelf parts. Using your example of uploading a large file, the Fusion might give you the best of both worlds...fastest write times, and then tiering the storage off to cheaper spinning disk.

Feb 7, 2013 6:24 AM in response to Stanley Horwitz

LaCie has had SSD Thunderbolt out for a bit now, and they are not the first if I recall.

Avialiable in 120 and 256 GB. There speed is 385MB/s but the internal mac mini speed

appears to be uknown and not advertised.

http://www.lacie.com/us/products/product.htm?id=10599


Elgato has them as well (270 MB/s vs Mac mini ???)

http://www.elgato.com/elgato/na/mainmenu/products/ThunderboltSSD.en.html


Promise-Pegasus (750 MB/s vs MacMini ???)

http://store.apple.com/us/product/H9732ZM/A/promise-pegasus-j2-256gb-2-by-128gb- ssd-thunderbolt-storage-solution


When is the last time you looked?

SSD vs Fusion vs HD

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.