Max Stanley wrote:
I'm thinking of upgrading my iMac and getting the 2012 27-inch 3.4Ghz i7, 3TB Fusion, 680MX 2GB GPU and add 16GB of ram later.
The 2011 has the option for 3 drives, built-in optical drive if necessary.
BUt the 2012 seems more stable, less internal components to get hot and more space accomedating in a smaller office/room.
anyone prefer one over the other? have you had both?
Both ssls6 and MichelPM have given you an opinion, but it all comes down to your requirements. If you really need to have any of the items that are 'missing' from the 2012 built-in to the unit then the 2011 might be a better choice for you.
I made the decision for a 2012, moving from a 2010 model rather than a reconditioned 2011 for several reasons. I received my late-2012 top of the line order (except I have a 3TB fusion drive not the expensive SSD only version) in mid December and am 100% satisfied with it so far.
Below are my reasons for the purchase of the 2012 rather than the 2011, but you may find something that aligns with your situation.
I never used the internal CD/DVD drive on the 2010. Early in the process I determined that the quality of the CD/DVD drive is one of the places Apple really fell short of top-notch. I bought an external OWC tray loading drive for $100 and it is faster, quieter, and more reliable than the internal drive. I have a large desk and providing room for the OWC isn't an issue.
The first thing I did whenever I received a new iMac was to turn off the IR reception. I have an Apple TV in the same room and controlling the Apple TV would also control the iMac. Not funny or desirable.
I purchased an Apple Thunderbolt to FW800 adapter and have my three remaining FW800 outboard drives at the end of my chain of two Thunderbolt drives. Works like a champ. I don't need a FW800 port residing on my iMac.
Having the SD slot on the back is a minor issue, but it is balanced by the fact that I never insert the SD card into the optical drive slot. I consider this a total wash in usability.
I never used the audio Line In capability on any of my iMacs. I knew of the fact that it is not available on the 2012 so I purchased an iMic at the same time "Just In Case" and it works well--for me--if I should ever need audio Line In capabilities I have it.
The 2012 runs cooler with all four cores running full tilt than the 2010 does idling. I suspect this to be the same with the 2011 because the physical design didn't change all that much between the 2010 and 2011 models. I wash my micro fiber cloths out by hand and use the edges of the top of the 2010 as a rack to dry them. Can't even begin to do that with the 2012 😀
The 2012 comes with an option for a larger HDD with fusion.
The display on the 2012 has much less glare. Apple claims a 75% reduction in glare and I can attest to that. I work with my back to a window and have absolutely zero problems with glare. I fought the glare quite often with the 2010 which has the same display as the 2011.
I've comapred the speakers in the 2010 side by side with the 2012. I don't have any figures to post, and I realize that this is a personal opinion with which others may disagree, but I do prefer the 2012 speaker sound.
I cannot hear the fan in the 2012 unless the CPU has been running at full capacity for several minutes and then it is barely audible to me. The fan on the 2010 is rather loud.
I'm sure that I would have been happy with the 2011, but I believe I am happier with the 2012 than I would have been with the 2011. As always, YMMV, and I'm sure there are many who feel as MichelPM does and I don't for a minute think they are wrong in their choice of the 2011 over the 2012. Different people have different needs.