Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Installing SSD in 24" iMac (early 2009)

I've been thinking about replacing my hard drive (I posted previously about this) and by looking around have noticed that SSDs have now come down in price a lot. Here in the UK there is a SanDisk 480GB Extreme SSD for 270GBP. I've heard that SSDs can make a huge difference in performance and this drive isn't far off my current storage. I also have a 4TB NAS and 1TB FW drive so I'm Ok for space.


I've had a look at a few Youtube videos and it seems straightforward to swap, once I have a 2.5" to 3.5" bay converter.


My question is are there any compatibility issues with SSDs and my iMac (24" early 2009 2.93Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo)? I understand SATA III is SATA II compatible. I also believe that my iMac model has the external heat sensor so this shouldn't be a problem.


Also if anyine has any experience of a 2.5" to 3.5" bay converter that fits well, it would be great to know.


Thanks

Posted on Apr 24, 2013 1:59 AM

Reply
48 replies

Oct 13, 2017 6:59 PM in response to David McCourt

Hi, just to report a successful swap of HDD to SSD inside iMac Early 2009 model.


I just replaced Apple HDD Hitachi 640Gb with Samsung 840 Evo 250GB.



Couple of remarks:


- Following iFixit manual - they don't mention you have to unscrew the memory bay cover at the bottom to release the whole bezel part while opening the iMac.


- I didn't have to buy additional thermal part, as I could simply re-attach external one attached to HDD, where I placed it very close to SATA connectors - the fan runs at minimal speed after the replacement (I bought 2.5" --> 3.5" drive tray)


- I used cloning software (SuperDuper!) to copy the whole drive (with bootable option checked) connected to one of USB ports

-- with very low transfer over USB of course, around 75GB copied over 2 hours

-- it did boot from USB connected SSD after the clone copy was finished

and then after I swapped drives it did boot nicely.



The Blackmagic Disk Speed Test benchmark reports:

Write: 198MB/s

Read: 269MB/s

Nov 14, 2017 12:43 AM in response to David McCourt

You are not going to reach the speeds of an ssd.




Difference between SATA I, SATA II and SATA III

SATA II (revision 2.x) interface, formally known as SATA 3Gb/s, is a second generation SATA interface running at 3.0 Gb/s. The bandwidth throughput, which is supported by the interface, is up to 300MB/s.

SATA III (revision 3.x) interface, formally known as SATA 6Gb/s, is a third generation SATA interface running at 6.0Gb/s. The bandwidth throughput, which is supported by the interface, is up to 600MB/s. This interface is backwards compatible with SATA 3 Gb/s interface.

SATA II specifications provide backward compatibility to function on SATA I ports. SATA III specifications provide backward compatibility to function on SATA I and SATA II ports. However, the maximum speed of the drive will be slower due to the lower speed limitations of the port.


Example: SanDisk Extreme SSD, which supports SATA 6Gb/s interface and when connected to SATA 6Gb/s port, can reach up to 550/520MB/s sequential read and sequential write speed rates respectively. However, when the drive is connected to SATA 3 Gb/s port, it can reach up to 285/275MB/s sequential read and sequential write speed rates respectively.

Apr 26, 2013 6:19 AM in response to David McCourt

Thanks guys, that is really helpful. I didn't know about the Sandforce issues with nVidia graphics cards nor about overprovisioning (I assume that both of these are to be avoided?).


Ideally a Samsung 840 pro would be good but a bit out of my price range.


I think I'll go for this Crucial 480gb SSD: http://www.ebuyer.com/497433-crucial-480gb-m500-ssd-ct480m500ssd1


Interestingly when I ran the Crucial SSD wizard on its site, it said that no SSDs were compatible with my model. Any ideas why that might be? They're listed on the OWC site as OK.


Tafftech did you use a 3.5" adpapter to fit it or just velcro it to the case?


Thanks again.

Apr 26, 2013 10:19 AM in response to David McCourt

Basically, more over provisioning is good, it means the drive is bigger than stated, & is used for mapping out bad cells for one thing, a 120GB SSD with 7% over provisioning is actually 128GB underneath...


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Write_amplification#Over-provisioning


General you want Sandforce chipset, but do you have more info on the nVidia issues?


OWC actually tests these things, I doubt Crucial does.

Apr 26, 2013 11:02 AM in response to David McCourt

Sorry I wrote nVidia graphics cards when I meant nVidia drivers. Seen a few things on Amazon reviews, other sites and these:


https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4243422?start=0&tstart=0


http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1388966


Seems it is an issue with low negotiation speeds on 2008 models but it didn't sound good.


Sorry I misunderstood about over provisioning.


Unfortuately OWC drives are quite expensive here in the UK. The Crucial drive was listed on the OWC page and it gets good reviews on Amazon. Might do some more research on the SanDisk one. Too much choice!


Thanks

Apr 26, 2013 11:02 AM in response to David McCourt

I think you are going to run into problems when you want to put a new SSD into the superdrive bay:

the standard HDD bay has a sata-2 (3GB/s) connector which is one step down from the modern sata-3 SSD's and those are downwards compatible: but not 2 steps without possible issues.

The superdrive slot is Ultra-ata 100 which may not work to put an SSD in.

Bua the 2.5" SSD and put it in the standard HDD slot.

Apr 26, 2013 12:10 PM in response to David McCourt

Some possible insight to those linked problems from OWC's site...


This OWC 6G SSD Model is compatible with nearly any Mac or PC model with a Serial ATA connection (SATA, SATA 2.0, or SATA 3.0) including:

  • All Mac Pro models
  • All PowerMac G5 models
  • All MacBook Pro models NOTE exceptions below
  • All Mac mini 2006-Current (All Intel Models)
  • iMac 2006-current (All Intel Models)
  • iMac G5
  • All MacBook models NOTE model exceptions below
  • Xserve 2009

Special note for specific 2008-2010 MacBooks & 2008-2009 MacBook Pros.

We highly recommend the use of a SATA 2.0 (3Gb/s) SSD such as the OWC Mercury Electra 3G for the following Macs:

MacBook Pro models with model ID:

How to find the model ID

  • MacBookPro5,1
  • MacBookPro5,2
  • MacBookPro5,3
  • MacBookPro5,4
  • MacBookPro5,5

MacBook models with model ID:

How to find the model ID

  • MacBook5,1
  • MacBook6,1
  • MacBook7,1

While a 6G SSD does function, it will only do so at SATA Revision 1.0 (1.5Gb/s, 150MB/s) speeds rather that the SATA Revision 2.0 (3.0Gb/s 300MB/s) speed the computer can deliver.

The Mercury Electra 3G SSD is the OWC recommended upgrade option for the Macs listed in the special note above.

Apr 26, 2013 12:47 PM in response to David McCourt

I think I'm now going with Samsung but my final question is 840 or 840 pro:


http://www.dabs.com/products/samsung-512gb-840-pro-series-sata-6gb-s-2-5--solid- state-drive-8BNT.html


http://www.dabs.com/products/samsung-500gb-840-series-sata-6gb-s-2-5--solid-stat e-drive-8BNY.html


Bearing in mind this is for a 2009 Mac is the pro version worth it?


Some good cashback deals here in the UK bring the 500GB 840 to 220GBP.


Thanks again for everyone's advice.

Apr 27, 2013 12:58 AM in response to David McCourt

The differencepro vs non-pro is the larger "over-provisioning" in the pro:

this means that when a spot is considered faulty by the ssd, it will be replaced by a spot in the extra space, this extra space is larger in the pro than in the normal one. The extra space is not used as user space.

SSD have a longer lifetime than HDD and I expect that the 840 has a much longer lifetime than your computer, I never use the pro versions.

Installing SSD in 24" iMac (early 2009)

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.