Thanks for the reply BenB. I appreciate your willingness to help with this topic, but I'm not sure you understand what I want to do and why.
I want to use the LUT for its Luma curve in actual color corrections in FCP-X. I am not trying to use it for display of dailies or other uses which are common with LUTs.
LOG space color space is similar, but not identical with many cameras. ARRI LOG-C is also very similar to the color space used in Cineon and DPX film scans which I used to see regularly. The black points may vary, but I can adjust black points in many ways. The general shape of the LUT curve should be very similar to other curves used to correct other LOG spaces. If these curves were dramatically different from eachother, they wouldn't be defined as LOG space. LOG is a mathematical formula for how the bits are arranged and reserved in the file structure which is somewhat similar to how stills photographers manage Zone System exposure indexes There is no magic about the way ARRI defines this. It is a way for ARRI footage to match 35mm scans easily and other cameras using LOG space such as the ones I am using regularly. I would LOVE to have Apple include specific LOG LUT's for each camera which I use, but since they have not done that yet, I would like to experiement with the included one which is designed for ARRI LOG-C.
I am a very experienced professional and understand very well how and why LUT's are being used in many ways across the industry. Yes, I use Resolve for certain tasks and yes, it is the best place to do advanced color work. The new Resolve LOG color correction pane is very useful and superior to all tools I've seen. But I also use and enjoy the convenience of keeping my material within FCP-X as much as possible. And in many cases, FCP-X color correction tools are adequate for my needs. But when using Cinestyle, cLOG or sLOG footage on my cameras, controlling the rolloff of highlights is very difficult to do with the simple 3-way controls. in FCP-X.
Since FCP-X has no Luma or RGB curves tool built-in, I currently use the Nattress Curves plugin in an Adjustment layer over my timelines to provide a basic film look. The downside to this is that not all my editbays have licenses for the 3rd party plugins, and also there are some odd workflow issues which would be much simpler to manage the way that FCP-X does with Arri LOG-C footage.
My question is how to trick FCP-X into thinking the footage is LOG-C so I can use the newly added checkbox to interpret the footage using the LOG-C LUT in an early stage of color correction while the footage is still managed in Floating Point color space.
The LOG-C profile in the Nattress plugin works as a very good starting point for advanced color correction for footage shot by Sony F3, Canon C and Canon Cinestyle cameras. In fact, it is also a fairly good starting point for GoPro Hero3 ProTune footage as well. I am not attempting ot use the LOG-C LUT solely for color correction. Instead, I want to use it for CineGamma tonal correction which is only possible with a proper luma or RGB Curve. I will then use the FCP-X color panes to ad specific modifications to each camera's footage to more closely match what I'm looking for. If I'm dealing with a camera with lower dynamic range, I adjust the FCP-X panes to compensate for that particular camera, then Paste these attributes to all the clips from that camera. This often results in a very good match from camera to camera while using the same LUT for the tonal look. I would like to test this technique using the built-in ARRI LOG-C feature, but unfortunately, cannot until FCP-X allows me to use the LUT on other kinds of footage.
I hope this makes sense. Keep in mind I am a very experienced and technical user and have a long history in the blogosphere and forums about these kinds of topics. I have very specific reasons for why I want to do this, and until Apple provides other LOG correction tools or a bonafide Curves tool, I am seeking to find a way to use the LOG-C as an alternative solution. BenB, it could be that Apple has closed out the LUT from other types of footage because of comments from their close peers which are not exactly helpful to actual real-world users. There are many more cLOG, sLOG and Cinestyle users using FCP-X than there are ARRI users and it is unfortunately they chose to limit their features to exclude these somewhat arbitrarily. My goal is to find a workaround for this odd decision and would love any tips or suggestions if the answer lies in the footage Metadata.