Q: Library backup on FAT32 drive
Hi,
I just read a reply from LeonieDF is another thread that got me wondering about something. I keep my referenced images on an external FAT32 drive, and also I have a seperate FAT32 drive that I occasionally export all the images in my library as jpg files. What is relevant to my question, I also keep a vault of my main library on each of these drives. Now Leonie mentioned that .aplibraries work better on HFS+ drives, which makes sense with the linking and whatnot that goes on in there.
My question is, are my vaults on these drives worth something or am I wasting my time?
Time Machine also backs up my library to a Time Capsule, and I have a CCC cloned drive of everything, so I am safe. Just checking if I might be wasting time/space keeping vaults on these drives as well.
Thanks for any insights!
Johann.
iMac, Mac OS X (10.6.5)
Posted on Jul 11, 2013 3:19 AM
Vaults are essentially Aperture Libraries, they just have another filename extension. And an Aperture library needs to be on a volume formatted for MacOS X - see this support article:
Use locally mounted Mac OS X Extended volumes for your Aperture library
With the wrong formatting you may have problems with files not being readable. Usually you will notice this problem when you need to copy or move a vault between drives, or when originals cannot be found.
So you'd better move your vaults to drive that is supported by MacOS X. I would not keep my original image files on a FAT32 formatted drive either, at least not, if you are using commands in Aperture, that will write metadat tags to your originals.
Regards
Léonie
Posted on Jul 11, 2013 3:34 AM