Virus and malware protection

The largest part of the July, 2006 issue of Macworld Magazine is devoted to the latest virus and malware threats to Mac OS based systems.

The various authors do a good job of documenting the recent threats to the Mac OS.

As a brand new iMac owner and computer user I have to plead guilty to the Magazine's central thesis that most people buy and use Macs because we feel that we are pretty much bullet proof against these threats. As the articles demonstrate this is not the case.

Does anyone out there have any recent experience with a good security suite that will stop viruses as well as other forms of malware/spyware?

Mac tech support was not a lot of help. Sales even less so. Their whole attitude was "You have a Mac, nothing can hurt you and you don't need anything else." One sales rep even told me that there are only two companies making anti-virus programs for OS X. I asked him who they were. His answer "Well right now only Norton and Symantec make an anti-virus for OS X." Dohhh!

Unless something happened that did not make the news Symantic and Norton are the same company!

Seriously, I don't want a bunch of junk on my computer. I am particularly unhappy with the threat from hackers and hijackers who can place Trojans and worms on the computer and extract passwords, credit card numbers, bank account information, etc.

According to the kids at the Universy computer lab here if you can place a cookie on an operating system, any operating system, you can put a key logger and similar malware on it. It does not matter if it is Windows, Unix based (Linux/Mac) Solaris, etc. If this is so, then my computer is vulnerable without some sort of protection.

Any and all personal experiences and recommendations ref: protective software is very much appreciated.

Thanks

Doug

iMac Core Duo, Mac OS X (10.4.6), 512gig RAM waiting on 2gigs

Posted on Jun 22, 2006 11:57 AM

Reply
24 replies

Jun 22, 2006 1:48 PM in response to Stormrydr

Blah, blah, blah. I have heard this before.

No viruses for Mac OS. Not fewer than Windows - NONE. Not a single documented virus has ever been released in the wild for Mac OS X. Zero.

Use common sense when broswing, do not open unsolicited attachments, do not use P2P software, don't browse adult websites or product activation "crack" sites and you are about as safe as can be.

Number of times I have reformmated and reinstalled everything on my Mac for any reason at all in the past 2+ years - NONE.

Number of times I have reformatted and reinstalled everything because my wife and kids can't not click on a "yes" box in a popup that unleashes a flurry of spyware that I cannot get rid of - 3 (and that is with up-to-date spyware/anti-virus/firewall software).

Call it a more secure OS or call it "security by obscurity" (which I do not buy), but the Mac OS is the most secure OS commercially available for the home user. Bar none.

If you want to run spyware tools, you can (they won't find much of anything). If you want to scan docs before you forward them to your Windows using friends - you can, but don't pay for it. Use ClamXav instead.

Do not have your main account set up as a root user and always look at what app is requesting your password before blindly typing it in. Download the Word macro-virus patch from Microsoft to close that hole.

Use a Mac and common sense and you can eliminate 90% of the threats.

Jun 22, 2006 2:20 PM in response to Stormrydr

SStormrydr,

The built-in firewall is industrial strength, when it's configured correctly.

 Apple recommends using antivirus as part of regular maintenance (Item 6).

Apple bundles clamav with OS X Server.

I recommend clamXav because it uses the same antivirus engine (clamav) that Apple bundles with OS X Server: the price is right (donation-requested-ware), it isn't demanding of system resources, it gives some protection against trojans and phishing, and clamav tends to update definitions faster than commercial antivirus programs.

Oh, and in spite of the loud denials that inevitably come, somebody has already released an OS X virus into the wild.

Spyware is a different matter, since your behavior (and browser and mail settings) is the determining factor.

-Wayne

Jun 22, 2006 2:25 PM in response to Eric Kracinski

Eric, the following are documented viruses/malware found on the Mac OS.

1. Leap-A, or Oompa Loompa This is a Trojan that can reside on a Mac. It is concealed in an article/photo about future Macs. This is hardly a "risky" or "risque" item. It is in fact a topic of great interest to Mac users and hardly something like **** where you would normlly have your guard up.

2. Inqtana-A This is a worm that resides in the Bluetooth feature of Macs. Apple has come up with a fix for this, and only unprotected Macs are at risk.

3. Zaptastic This is a hole in Widgets installation which allows keyloggers etc. to be placed on a Mac when you download a widget. Apple does have a fix for this one as well.

(See MacWorld, July, 2006. pg. 7, 48-57.

Since the July issue of MacWorld was published two more pieces of Malware have been detected which exploit vulnerabilities in iChat.

The testers at MacWorld claim they took a Mac and deliberately infected it with Leap-A to test anti-malware programs. The commercial software programs were evaluated. I am not going to do a commercial here and discuss the outcome.

But what is inarguable is that your premise that there are no viruses or malware that can infect the Mac is clearly in error. The danger is that probably millions of Mac users feel just like you do.

Because of that attitude, not any gross vulnerability of the Mac, the potential exists that more Macs are infected than PCs. The authors of the various articles point out that it is because Mac users have this false sense of security that Macs are so vulnerable, not because the Mac OS is more susceptible to attack than PCs.

I do not want to be like the man who went to the Zoo, pointed to the giraffe and said "There is no such animal". The threat is there. It is recognized and it has a name and can be replicated.

I want to insure that I don't get bitten. I fully believe the techs and experts who say that if a computer can accept a cookie it is vulnerable to malware. They have existing malware to prove it.

The fact there are only 5 known threats does not bring me a great deal of peace of mind. If there was only one strain of AIDs, or any other STD I would not engage in unprotected practices just because I could only catch one. I don't want to catch any of them.

That is why I wanted to know if anyone has real world experience using programs which scan your iMacs for malware that may already be in residence, or that can keep it out or clean/quarantine/delete it.

Doug

Jun 22, 2006 3:19 PM in response to Stormrydr

I agree with Eric. Don't ignore security but don't panic. Personally I have no more protection than OS X offers - but I do read Mac blogs almost daily and I don't have the attitude that the Mac will never get a virus - but I do think the PowerPC Macs will be safe. Viruses will get to the Intel Macs at some point. That list of your 3 issues is about it for Mac OS X.

2 and 3 have been fixed as you say and No. 1 on you list requires you to enter an Adminstrators password on your Mac for the trojan to do anything. I do agree with you that the attitude that Mac's can't be infected is dangerous - but I've seen many many posts on these boards that show that many Macs users aren't aware of how safe we are either.

So long as you maintain a good back-up routine for your valuable data I don't believe as of this time that Mac owners need to purchase additional protection.

mrtotes

Jun 22, 2006 3:19 PM in response to Stormrydr

I have used various versions of Norton or Symantec AntiVirus since way back with my Performa 430.

I currently run Norton AntiVirus 10.1.1 on a three-week old Intel iMac.

I've read all the horror stories about this program.

I have never experienced any problem related to a virus or the antivirus program.

Intel iMac20 Mac OS X (10.4.6)

Jun 22, 2006 3:34 PM in response to ParentalUnit

I am not tech savy enough to interpret all the data. Really the best thing to do is just get the magazine and read the article (No, I am not an employee of MacWorld Magazine.)

Seriously, please don't confuse me with someone who knows about this sort of thing. I am just a home user who wants a good reliable machine that can do basic word processing and internet research, as well as day to day chores.

That is why I want something simple, that a layman can understand, configure and maintain. I have no doubt that many readers of this forum could make an Apple OS sit up and beg for cookies (pun intended). I am not one of them.

I just want a nice reliable security suite that will keep my personal info secure, and that is simple enough for me to use. I can read all the articles on it that I want, but anecdotal evidence is better; in my humble opinion.

Thanks 🙂

Doug

Jun 22, 2006 4:16 PM in response to Stormrydr

Doug,

Security is a moving target, not an end: Choose an appropriate level of paranoia and budget and act accordingly.

The simplest solution is to never store or transmit personal information by computer. If that's not practical, you have some choices for OS X.

A word of caution: I have not personally vetted or tested any of the following software:

One semi-Open Source solution is Vaultlet Suite. EPIC refers to it - your mileage may vary.

A Mac-centric solution (again unvetted or tested by me) is info_xhead.

Here's a page devoted to secure Mac storage, although I don't see product reviews.

Here's Indiana University's computer security advice. (It looks to be a fairly generic guide for academia.)

-Wayne

Jun 22, 2006 5:09 PM in response to Stormrydr

Stormryder, I am not saying that you should fly naked out there, I am saying that there is no need for panic.

computer virus (n.) a self-replicating computer program that spreads by inserting copies of itself into other executable code or documents.

Strictly speaking, the three examples you give fail to meet this definition. Leap-A is a trojan which does not replicate. It also requires user interaction. Inqtana-A is a worm that again, needs interaction to open and spread. Zaptastic is a security hole in OS X, specifically Dashboard. None of them meet the requirements for being a virus.

Semantics aside, why would you download images from someone you do not know without scanning them first? That's how Leap-A spreads. Why would you not update your Bluetooth or your widgets with the security fixes that Apple publishes and recommends? Those close both the Inqtana-A and Zaptastic holes.

Anyone who does not use their brains when surfing and does not apply security updates the second they are available from Apple is leaving themselves open to breeches. No anti-virus software in the world will overcome user stupidity and laziness.

Sorry to sounds so harsh, but when there is a true virus for the Mac OS, we will hear about it instantly and repeatedly for weeks on end. Windows fanboys will flaunt it in our faces. Until then, I know I am safe. Experience has told me that.

There is a huge difference between a virus and a security vulnerability.

"But what is inarguable is that your premise that there are no viruses or malware that can infect the Mac is clearly in error. The danger is that probably millions of Mac users feel just like you do."

I never said that there was no malware. I said there was very little. This is what I said -

"If you want to run spyware tools, you can (they won't find much of anything)."

Big difference.

Mac users feel like I do because they are intelligent enough to know when a magazine and software publisher are trying to sell copies of their software and magazines instead of publishing useful facts. No software will expose the exploits or close those security holes that are out there. So using commercial software to make yourself feel more secure does just that - makes you feel more secure.

"Because of that attitude, not any gross vulnerability of the Mac, the potential exists that more Macs are infected than PCs"

Not a single Mac running OS X has a virus that will effect the Mac itself on it anywhere in the world. Fact.

I have myself behind a router, with the OS X firewall enabled. I also download the security patches that pop up in software update as soon as I am advised to do so. Sometimes I hear about it before SU does and I run it to grab that patch right away. I also do not have myself logged in as a root user. When an installer asks for my password, I double check to see that it is the program that I am actually installing. I regularly check Microsoft for Office updates that close the inevitable holes in their software.

I am vigilant, but I am not paranoid. I - along with many Mac users - do not run AV software and have never been infected or breeched because we use common sense.

No software can protect a user from themselves.

Jun 22, 2006 6:20 PM in response to Eric Kracinski

I like the be vigilant but not paranoid statment.

I like the idea of being a "Prudent Sailor" even better.

When the manufacturer of my computer tells me I should have an antivirus program and keep it up to date, I have to give that a lot of weight, and I do.

When folks at the computer lab here who have no financial interest tell me to run a security suite, I give that a lot of weight. Collectively they have several centuries of experience.

Macworld wants to sell advertising. So why in the world would they want to aggrivate their biggest potential market (That would be Apple.) by saying Apples can catch viruses if it is not an issue?

In summary, Apple itself says use an antivirus, the professionals with Ph.D. behind their names say run antivirus. Ok, call me overly cautious. But what is the harm in my taking their advice? If there is no threat I am in no way diminished. If there is a threat I have some protection.

I would really like to get beyond whether or not I should have a security suite and focus on what are the best ones out there. If I am mistaken, it is a harmless error, and I will not be hurt by it.

Any constructive recommendations on real world experiences with various programs are appreciated.

Thanks,

Doug

Jun 23, 2006 9:44 AM in response to Stormrydr

On a scale of 1 to 10, Norton is about a 2 (not difficult). You install it. You adjust a few settings. It updates itself every day or every week or whatever you want. After a year you decide whether you want to spend another $15 for the automatic updates (you can continue to update manually for free). That's it.

Intel iMac20 Mac OS X (10.4.6)

Jun 23, 2006 11:09 AM in response to Stormrydr

Leap-A had limited distribution, and is gone now, as Apple's patched the hole it came in through.

Inqtana-A never got into "the wild" - it was shown as a demonstration only - and is dead anyway, because it, too, relied on a patched hole.

Zaptastic was a demonstration as well - all it did was display a message on screen when you clicked a link in a web page - and it's gone as well.

Seeing a pattern?

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Virus and malware protection

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.