Working with large time lapse project

I have a "large" time lapse project in Final Cut Pro X. About 10,000 photos that I want to use to create an 7 minute long video (aprox. 10,000 frames at 24 fps equals about 7 minutes). So it's not that terrifying large, I'd assume people were doing much larger time lapse projects.


The problem is, when I create an event and add these photos to it, performance of Final Cut gets really terrible. Beachballs rotating when ever I click on anything, sometime for half an hour or longer while Final Cut is doing "something" in the background. When I exit Final Cut and re-open it, it takes forever to load both event and project.


What I did was simply standard workflow from many tutorials out there on the web. Add photos to an event, create new project, drop photos from the event on timeline, adjust timing of video, merge individual photos into compound clip. Nothing fancy.


Am I doing something terribly wrong, or is Final Cut really that bad choice of software for doing time lapse video?

Posted on Sep 24, 2013 9:04 PM

Reply
12 replies

Sep 25, 2013 8:07 AM in response to Karsten Schlüter

Well, I'm in computer business, and photography/video is only my hobby. So my expectations of what is realistic for given CPU is about at right level. I don't have expectations that any piece of software will render video based off my original input files in real-time. I did let FC create optimized files. There was nothing preventing it to for example create much smaller copies for editing and preview, and use originals for rendering during final export. Or to pre-render composite clip and use that instead of extremely slow re-rendering from originals after every minor adjustment, when all I needed was to see small preview.


Some other pieces of software I tried don't choke on these like FC does. E.g. Picasa (which is free, unlike FC) works fine. I actually had to delete event and project folders from the disk to be able to recover FC into any kind of usable state. Otherwise it would take it hours just to start up!? Unfortunately, Picasa seems to have some built in limits (it renders this video only about half-way through for some reason). I'll give MPEG Streamclip Tom suggested a go. I see Compressor is paid app, and price is a bit too high for something that doesn't have trial mode (i.e. I don't want to risk spending $50, just to find out it doesn't work for what I need to do; low ratings and bad reviews on app store don't help build my confidence to blindly buy it either).

Sep 25, 2013 9:55 AM in response to Alex--

Alex-- wrote:


Well, I'm in computer business, … Or to pre-render composite clip and use that instead of extremely slow re-rendering from originals after every minor adjustment, when all I needed was to see small preview.

then you know: read the manual. 😉

… about settings for background rendering, proxy use etc ...


… Some other pieces of software I tried don't choke on these like FC does. E.g. Picasa (which is free, unlike FC) works fine. …


use the tool which fits your needs best!


no probs with FCPX here so far, on a 5y old MacMini, 2.26GHZ ...

but I don't create projectswith 10k of photos.

Onlyusing 6 cameras simultanously, with 5 diff. formats - no-budget-production! 😁

Sep 25, 2013 10:46 AM in response to Karsten Schlüter

Well, I do think I had settings set up correctly, and all the right checkboxes checked out. And went through the fine manual, as well as several pages online on how to set things up and what all the different things do. It is always possible I missed something, of course. I'll go through it again this evening. Do you have anything particular in mind to double-check or pay special attention to?

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Working with large time lapse project

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.