How long should a slideshow take to export?

I made a 6 minute slideshow with 49 (4000x3000 pixel) jpegs on my Toshiba laptop using the basic photo apps that come with Windows 7.


It has dissolves and Ken Burns type effects on each slide and took a few minutes to export to 1080p.


However, as it was in .wmv format, I decided to remake it from scratch in Aperture.


However, the export on my Core 2 Duo iMac took 21 minutes to get to 50% but then seemed to have slowed right down and in the next 21 minutes it has only reached 62%.


In the next 7 minutes it has just moved to 63%, so is absolutely crawling!


This is the third time I have tried as I got fed up with the excessive time it was taking and aborted the earlier attempts, thinking that I might be doing something wrong.


Is this time normal, with the drastic progressive slowdown, as the Toshiba laptop has usually got a similar performance to the iMac and took less than 20 minutes to do the original slideshow?


Or am I doing something wrong?

iMac, OS X Mountain Lion (10.8.5), Little knowledge... many opinions.

Posted on Sep 27, 2013 3:53 AM

Reply
13 replies

Sep 27, 2013 5:05 AM in response to Ian R. Brown

Update to the above.


When I wrote the original post the export had taken 50 minutes, reached just 63% and seemed to be slowing progressively so that I was expecting it to take many hours.


Imagine my surprise when I came back at 90 minutes to discover it was finished!


So it must have suddenly speeded up.


However, it is still a ridiculously long time for a 6 minute video.


During the time I was away from the iMac I went back to my £330 Toshiba laptop and created another identical slideshow on Windows Live Photo Gallery.


It took 8 minutes to export a 1080p video file, which is about a tenth the time ............... the only downside is that it is .wmv.


Furthermore the Toshiba slideshow is only 600MB whilst the Aperture one is over 3GB

Feb 3, 2014 8:48 AM in response to Ian R. Brown

I have found exports in Aperture take very long times to create 1080p files.

Aperture is good though in that you can treat videos the same as stills and make an mp4 file using slideshow ( a much easier process than using iMovie).

I am about to embark on a project to convert many movie clips gathered over the years into organised mp4 files for my Synology NAS drive. But the export times are awful. I may have to live with it though. It is interesting that if you import the file produced by Aperture into Handbrake to export an mp4 file, then file sizes are reduced by a factor of more than 10 with no discernible loss of quality - which implies the Aperture export feature is faulty.

Feb 3, 2014 10:02 AM in response to sirslabknit

I have found that my bargain-basement Toshiba windows laptop is also up to 10 times faster converting my video files to different formats.


So whenever I have a file to convert on my iMac, I transfer it to the laptop for conversion.


The laptop is not faster than the iMac in everything and when I Geekbench Tested both computers they produced similar scores with the laptop only marginally ahead.

Feb 3, 2014 10:40 AM in response to Ian R. Brown

Interesting you have found a way of creating smaller files as I have.

But why doesn't Apple Aperture create smaller files - and therefore much faster!! I need to work at 1080p to preserve quality, and understand that other formats export much quicker.

I have just reduced a 2 min 22 sec slideshow (which took about 20 minutes to export) from 1780 MB to 147 MB using Handbrake - that's about 7% of original size and quality is preserved.. Maybe I am missing something?

Feb 3, 2014 1:07 PM in response to sirslabknit

I am about to embark on a project to convert many movie clips gathered over the years into organised mp4 files for my Synology NAS drive. But the export times are awful. I may have to live with it though. It is interesting that if you import the file produced by Aperture into Handbrake to export an mp4 file, then file sizes are reduced by a factor of more than 10 with no discernible loss of quality - which implies the Aperture export feature is faulty

When aperture is creating the video from the slides it is not only converting the format, it is rendering transitions and effects. Rendering the animations in high quality is always much slower than simply converting a video to a different format. It is not the file size of the finished movie that matters so much - the rendering time is more determined by the pixel size of the video, the number of slides, and the settings for transitions and special effects.

Feb 15, 2014 5:16 AM in response to Ian R. Brown

I have now found a much better method of generating a movie from clips. Using the album/slideshow/export feature in Aperture is next to useless because of the long creation times for the mp4 combined movie file and a subsequent (optional) reduction in file size(10x for me) with Handbrake.


I have now hit on another much easier option. It's called QuickTime Pro, costs about 20 GBP. It needs Quicktime Player 7. (Registration is difficult. You have to quit QuickTime after registering and reopen). Any way with QT Pro you can open your first movie, drag the second and third etc (directly out of Aperture even) and save to a new file. This combines all clips together perfectly, and in no time at all. I believe you can do the same thing even with standard Quicktime.


Why not document this properly Apple and save every one a pile of time.

Feb 15, 2014 7:13 AM in response to Ian R. Brown

Sorry by movie I meant a "clip" held in Aperture, i.e a video clip.


If you select a clip from an Aperture browser window and drop it into Quicktime Pro it will insert the clip at the position of the pointer in QTP (normally use the extreme right or extreme left position). You can then drag and drop more clips. When done you can "Save as", normally using "Save as a self contained movie".


Very simple and you have a combined movie in no time (by comparison with other methods).


Also of course you can use "Trim" on the clips beforehand to pick the best parts of the clip (use the little wheel on the navigation bar for the clip).

Feb 15, 2014 7:38 AM in response to Ian R. Brown

You can also create a slideshow easily. Export or drag required photos from Aperture into a temporary folder. Then from QTP do “Open Image Sequence” having selected the first photo in the temporary folder. Select a “frame rate” of say "5 seconds per frame" (maybe a little less). This is a lot easier than using Aperture (or iPhoto) slideshows and exporting them into a mov file. (I use Handbrake on the resulting mov file to reduce its size and create an mp4 file, without apparent loss in quality, before posing to my NAS).

Feb 15, 2014 7:44 AM in response to sirslabknit

Thanks for the explanation, however, my main concern is with making slideshows from still pictures as I use FCP X and FCP 7 for creating videos.


Could this method be used to quickly create slideshow/videos composed of stills with the Ken Burns effect?


As I mentioned at the start of the thread, I was disappointed with my iMac and Aperture taking well over an hour to create a 6 minute 1080p slideshow when my cheap Windows laptop could achieve identical visual quality in 8 minutes.


I can and do use the laptop for this task but it seems wrong that my iMac can't do the same in around the same time.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

How long should a slideshow take to export?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.