Thermal compound replacement, RESULTS and PICTURES

YOU CAN HAVE A MACBOOK PRO THAT ISN'T SCORCHING HOT!!
(note that this will NOT fix any whine or moo; they are unrelated problems)

Here's how.

My Mother's Macbook Pro (Or Cookbook, if you will) Arrived a week ago today. I played around with it to make sure everything is alright because my mother doesn't know how to check for things like dead pixels, bad ram, or cough improperly applied thermal compound.

One of the first things I noticed after turning on the new MBP is how totally sweet it is! The second thing I noticed is how freaking hot it is: I recoiled in pain from the Fn key bar the first time I touched it. Disappointed, I started searching the web and sure enough, pretty much everyone who owns one is complaining that it's too hot for comfortable use.

Apple calling this a "notebook" instead of a "laptop" is a total semantic cop-out. It's a PORTABLE COMPUTER and I must be able to trust it around my dogs, children, valuables without the MagSafe burning up or the battery swelling and bursting.

I don't have objective figures for just how hot it was, but it was right about at my pain threshold above and below the belt, and sometimes over it. I couldn't hold my hand to it for more than a few seconds. In particular the area to the left of the touchpad was of concern. I do have before-and-after figures of the CPU and HDD; I invite yourselves to look at them:

Before After (Temps in degrees C, ambient 25 C)
50-60 26-35 CPU (idle)
76-85 56-65 CPU (load)
41 33 HDD

In particular the HDD figures are a great relief. HDDs are notoriously sensitive to temperature and even a few degrees C can cut their lifetimes significantly. Furthermore the area is now cool to the touch and I can once again rest my left palm on it without discomfort. The ranges are due to the fact that the sensor inside the core duo is flaky. In 5 seconds it can run anywhere from +-5 to +-10. Nevertheless it is accurate enough for our purposes. Below are photos, procedure, and a rough outline of test methodologies:

http://www.pbase.com/silentplummet/image/62641589

Here's the idle scenario before the procedure. The computer has been on for hours (days really) and I'm doing the work I normally do on it. TextEdit is open (to a little project I'm working on) with firefox and the temperature monitor. Alt-tab is to show that those are the only programs running. CPU temp is dead at 50 C. This is INSANE for an idle figure on ANY computer; desktop, laptop, "notebook" or otherwise.

http://www.pbase.com/silentplummet/image/62641590

The operation area and stress test. To stress the ATI chip I've jacked up the resolution, run a couple of quartz programs, SNES9x (a hardware emulator; the software shown is called "Energy Breaker") with a brutal multitasking OpenGL hardware renderer, and Google Earth. To get the CPU going I have Adobe's Lightroom processing thumbnails, and again SNES9x. For various I/O I have two shells executing yes > /dev/null, a USB mouse plugged in, and all the HDD access from lightroom. I figure it paints a pretty good picture of the "worst case scenario" of hardware stress for a laptop like this.

http://www.pbase.com/silentplummet/image/62641591

The CPU core(s) is at 76 C. I should note that at this point, as hot as the CPU is, overall the case is really not much hotter than it was before. In other words, it's just as unacceptable.

At this point I turned her off and dug in. I used a howto from Ifixit to serve as my guide. The procedure went without surprises until I got all the way to the logic board.

http://www.pbase.com/silentplummet/image/62641592

Dear lord!! That is an obscene amount of compound. It's casting a shadow over the rest of the board!! This gray gak is piled on so thick, it's no wonder the cooling system couldn't work effectively. It had even gotten all over components nowhere near the dies. That definitely cannot be good for their lifespan. Here's a shot of the heatpipe:

http://www.pbase.com/silentplummet/image/62641593

Terrible. Thermal compound has been squished out all over the place, including the chassis itself. This explains why it was getting so hot. A photo from the MBP service manual has been floating around the net, illustrating that this gross amount of compound is actually according to procedure.

http://www.pbase.com/silentplummet/image/62641594

Clean as a whistle. After removing the bulk of the compound with q-tips I used ArctiClean 2-step process to emulsify the rest and remove it with paper towels. You can see it's not perfect but it's close enough for me. I'm not overclocking this thing; I just want to run it "in spec" and have it not burn me. At this point, the CPU dies and the heat pipe interfaces should have mirror finishes. It's an overclocker's dream, and Apple already did the work for me.

http://www.pbase.com/silentplummet/image/62641595

This is how I applied Arctic Silver 5 to replace the compound I removed. Squeeze the tiniest little bit out of the syringe directly on to the die, and scrape it across with a flat edge (they recommend a razor blade but I just used a plastic ID card). Take the amount of compound you see on the Core Duo (on the right) and make a flat, even layer like the one you see on the ATI (left).

http://www.pbase.com/silentplummet/image/62641596

Turned it on and went straight for the hard stress test, after making sure everything was OK of course =) Wow! It reads 58 C in the screenshot, and doesn't go above 65C!! Moreover, there isn't even a bit of warmth above the Fn keys, and the HDD area is cool to the touch. I'd call this one a complete success. I'm idling right now and the temperature reads between 26 and 31C. Even the bottom is just slightly warm to the touch. Now I have a real laptop again!


So why did this happen?

There's a lot of confusion about the way the Macbook Pro cools itself. I admit it's confusing. Basically, Apple is shipping Macbook Pros with one cooling system, and replacing the thermal compound changes it into a very different system. Let me try to explain what I learned from digging around the hardware.

1. The built-in thermometer in the CPU is flaky. That's why you have to access it with a kernel extension and all kinds of hacks, and why Apple circumvented it completely in the cooling system. That's right: the MBP cooling system ignores the Core Duo temperature entirely.

2. The cooling system consists of a convective (my guess, I don't think anyone really knows what kind of) heatpipe which is in the base, directing heat out to two heatsinks which are then to be cooled by two fans if need be.

3. There are two temperature sensors. One is on the heatpipe itself, and the other one is on the chassis just next to the right fan. Probably the hardware monitors these temperatures and the differential between them to decide when to activate the fans and how long.

4. Behavior before the replacement procedure: The CPU core would get hot, hotter than I've ever seen a CPU go, at 80-85C. Most people confirm their MBPs also exhibit this. Where was this heat going? Well the fans didn't turn on until I put it at full load. Even when the fans did turn on, there wasn't much warm exhaust coming out of the vents at the back. The chassis heated up until it was unbearable, and most of the excess heat was being radiated away from it.

To sum up, the ineffective thermal interface between the CPU dies and the heat pipe was inhibiting heat from tripping the fan sensors. This explains why the fans didn't turn on until drastic temperatures were attained, and why the chassis got so hot. Essentially, the chassis was serving as a big heatsink for the CPU, which is the only reason it didn't overheat and shut down.

Effective, Apple, but not quite appropriate.

5. Behavior after the replacement procedure: The first thing you notice is that the fans scream from the second you turn the thing on. They aren't going full blast but pretty close to it. An effective thermal interface using an APPROPRIATE AMOUNT of AS5 (anything would do but I figured if I'm applying thermal compound, why not go for the authority) allows the heat to go straight from the cores into the heatpipe, tripping the sensor early and fast. The fans come on, I can feel hot air coming out the back, and the chassis now removed from the thermal equation is cool and comfortable again.

Of course, the thermal equation is different from before, and from the way Apple has tuned the fans to work from the factory configuration. This is more cooling than we probably need, and I foresee an update to Tiger allowing us to choose the thermal/noise tradeoff for ourselves.

Well, I hope that explains it, and I hope that those of you still suffering the abuses of your "in spec" MBP can take some hope from my findings, or are emboldened to go ahead and repeat the procedure yourself. I will post informative links here.

http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/85.1.0.html
http://www.arcticsilver.com/
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1864582 (This is where I learned of the thermal paste issue)

Remember if you ever open up your MBP to NOT BREAK ANYTHING and please, always read the instructions before you reach in. =)

Mac mini, Mac OS X (10.4.6)

Posted on Jun 28, 2006 7:34 PM

Reply
34 replies

Jun 28, 2006 8:48 PM in response to methanol

methanol, nice writeup.

But my week 12 MBP has the factory thermal grease application and does not have a heat problem.

Cautionary note: My supposition is that if the thermal grease is cleaned and reapplied the computer's warranty will be void, as would any purchased AppleCare policy, for any failure of the logic board, CPUs, etc. The modification is easily visible to any Apple technician opening up the computer. And the modification does not meet Apple's specifications for thermal grease application. Read the warranty language carefully.

My MBP has been running for hours under light load, surfing and writing. Not long ago i scanned in some documents and ran an OCR application. The current CPU temperature is 43C. The computer case is cool. I have applied both firmware updates and all other Apple updates. Current system is OS X 10.4.7.

Jun 28, 2006 8:55 PM in response to Bill DeVille

Have you checked to see whether your thermal grease application is as inappropriate as mine was?

I wouldn't discount the possibility of a factory employee somewhere out there, realizing how stupid the default instructions are, and applying an appropriate amount on her own judgment.

Therefore I ask, do you know that you have the same "factory" application as do the rest of us with problems?

(ps I'm watching a DVD and my core hasn't left the 26 C mark. It's a little different from idle at 43C. I'm very glad you don't have a heat problem though! Enjoy your cool MBP!! =)

Jun 28, 2006 9:24 PM in response to methanol

methanol, my conclusion is that Apple's specifications for thermal grease application are technically sound. As a corollary, I put the postings claiming that isn't so in the Urban Myth category.

There's a lot of technical literature on design and manufacturing specifications for thermal grease use, the kind of literature that appears in professional technical publications and is written by engineers. That literature supports Apple's thermal grease specifications. Putting it another way, Apple's engineers have a lot more technical training and experience than the average hobbyist who is working from the directions that came with Arctic Silver.

Yes, my computer has the "messy" looking application of thermal grease. No, it isn't inappropriate and doesn't need to be modified, and Apple did not make a quality assurance/quality control mistake.

Posts about the thermal grease modification began appearing several months ago, followed by Hardware Monitor charts showing considerable differences in "before fix" and "after fix" temperatures. I found, however, that I could easily replicate those before and after charts, and my computer compared favorably with the "after fix" temperature charts. Why? There was no quality control on the generation of the charts. And of course some owners damaged their computers in the process of taking them apart and putting them back together. Not a good idea, in my opinion.

Painstaking manual application of thermal grease might result in an insignificant drop in CPU temperature, perhaps 2 or 3C. Trying that in a mass production situation would result in more CPU failures.

True, some people got very significant reductions of case temperatures. That will happen if the sensors are not working (broken connection) and the fans run full out. 🙂

Jun 28, 2006 9:26 PM in response to Kappy

That is possible. I'm almost certain that I've re-attached them both. One possibility is that I may have attached one (or both) backwards. I don't know whether they can be inserted the wrong way or not, but I am going to find out tomorrow and update this.

Edit: thank you very much for that link. I had already read the article but was looking for it again. Thanks.

Jun 28, 2006 9:46 PM in response to Bill DeVille

I found, however, that I could easily replicate those before and after charts, and my computer compared favorably with the "after fix" temperature charts. Why? There was no quality control on the generation of the charts.


At the end of the day, what do these empirical data say about my MBP that went from burningly hot to an almost soothing cool?

True, some people got very significant reductions of case temperatures. That will happen if the sensors are not working (broken connection) and the fans run full out. 🙂


Your comparison is invalid.

The fans would run full out under load even before I did the modification. Even so, they couldn't push the temperature below about 70C, higher if I hobbled the heatsinking effect by removing the MBP from a hard surface. My fans may be running now but I'm sitting at 25C and can't make it go -above- 60. (The CPU's sensor being flaky I have decided to just go with mean values)

At any rate I will open her back up to look for a broken thermal sensor connection. I'm pretty sure I re-connected them, however.

Jun 28, 2006 10:04 PM in response to methanol

Hi, methanol. It's summertime in Louisiana, so my air conditioner is on all the time.

My computer is running cool, but the right wrist rest is almost too cool. If I drop my right wrist down onto the metal surface feels almost cold.

I would be surprised by a CPU temp of 25C (77F) if the computer has been running long enough to reach equilibrium at idle. My ambient temperature is 72F, and I would expect the CPU to be more than 5F above ambient. Right now my CPU is reading 41C (105.8F). That's still cooler than the first time I visited Dallas, Texas. The temperature on that July day was 112.4F.

Jun 28, 2006 10:16 PM in response to Bill DeVille

This isn't really about CPU temps at all. I couldn't care less if the CPU was 100C or higher, as long as the case is cool and the thing is under warranty I'm fine with whatever temperature the CPU wants.

I'm quoting core temperatures insofar as they can reveal the effectiveness of the transfer of heat away from the core and into the heatpipe assembly, rather than away from the core and into my **** chassis.

Neither am I interested in the appeal of micronized silver poly-silicone over the zinc oxide crud that comes from the factory. They're both probably fine if applied correctly. With the heatpipe faces and dies being mirror smooth as they are, you hardly need any at all. But with 2 mm of goop in between the surfaces, the efficiency of the system to move the thermal load is shot. You and your engineers know that as well as I do.

I admit one factor I haven't controlled for is the torque on the screws anchoring the logic board to the chassis. I did 'em fairly good because I didn't want there to be any mistake about the die-heatpipe interface.

Still, nothing changes the fact that this laptop (I REFUSE to call it a "notebook") doesn't get uncomfortably hot anymore: load or not. Feeling the underside under load, I notice the heat is no longer concentrated in the center of the posterior underside, but rather distributed to two loci, corresponding exactly to where the heatsinks are. This just proves to me that the system is now working as it should.

Oh, and I'm sure you know where you can stuff your technical documents written by engineers. Everyone's an engineer on the internet. And a technical writer. And the captain of the football team.

My father actually IS a radio engineer with a considerable reputation. He was laughing out loud when I showed him the goop piled up all over the CPUs and components near them.

Jun 28, 2006 10:57 PM in response to methanol

Great posting Methanol, but I think your alittle braver than some of us. At much as I would like to do something like that I'm more worried about myself messing something up lol. But thanks again for the post, clears up the fact that Apple is more interested in compromise on the MBP than quality when it comes to comfortable heat. I would rather have a laptop that is 1 1/2" that can effectively cool than one that is 1" and has trouble staying below boiling point. Thanks again!

Jun 29, 2006 1:30 AM in response to Bill DeVille

I think it's safe to say that there are variances in the manufacturing process, and some people (like yourself) may have a system that just runs cooler than others. It is great to hear that the heat isn't a problem for you, and that your 'book runs at a reasonable temperature. Mine on the other hand, is idling right now at 149F. It's just sitting here, and all I'm doing is reading the discussion forums. CPU usage is at 1.5%. That does seem a bit excess to me. Furthermore, the fans are barely even whirring. Yes, I have the firmware updates in place, and I've been told that this is "normal."

That said, I'm still not sure I'll open mine up and attempt a warrenty voiding procedure...though each time I hear one of these reports it makes me more curious. I would like to know whether or not the reported fan speeds here are the result of an improperly connected terminal. The description does sound a bit fishy...

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Thermal compound replacement, RESULTS and PICTURES

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.