-
All replies
-
Helpful answers
-
Apr 12, 2014 10:01 PM in response to gumsieby jayv.,Does your Mac still sleep on schedule, (not manually), now that you have Server installed?
No idea really, the server is on 24/7 as I want to be able to reach it any time anywhere. I have the drives set to spin down automatically and that works fine but have not tested energy saver settings beyond that. As there is no display, mouse or keyboard connected I have not played with display sleep, screensavers etc either.
-
Apr 12, 2014 10:31 PM in response to jayv.by fogr4,The mac won't sleep when the server is running.
You can issue this command to see if sleep is being prevented:
pmset -g assertions
If "PreventSystemSleep" and "PreventUserIdleSystemSleep" are 1 then sleep is being prevented by the applications listed further down on the listing
-
Apr 13, 2014 1:07 AM in response to fogr4by gumsie,fogr4 wrote:
The mac won't sleep when the server is running.
You can issue this command to see if sleep is being prevented:
pmset -g assertions
If "PreventSystemSleep" and "PreventUserIdleSystemSleep" are 1 then sleep is being prevented by the applications listed further down on the listing
That was as I suspected. It had the same behaviour in the previous server too.
-
Apr 13, 2014 3:19 AM in response to gumsieby Csound1,gumsie wrote:
Whilst I've no proof that AAPL are guilty of course,
So you are speculating, even though speculation is explicitly banned in the terms of use?
-
Apr 13, 2014 4:16 AM in response to Csound1by french Apple-User,Csound1 wrote:
gumsie wrote:
Whilst I've no proof that AAPL are guilty of course,
So you are speculating, even though speculation is explicitly banned in the terms of use?
Hello Csound1 !
You are one of the best TOE-cops in the thread. Always vigilant and alert to denounce a misuse of the terms of use.
From my point of view, you missed again another opportunity to just keep quiet.
There are valuable arguments to answer to Gumsie, you used the less interesting one.
What about 1 or 2 days of … silence ?
-
Apr 13, 2014 5:33 AM in response to french Apple-Userby Csound1,What about 1 or 2 days of … silence ?
For you?
Excellent idea.
-
Apr 13, 2014 5:38 AM in response to Csound1by gumsie,Csound1 wrote:
What about 1 or 2 days of … silence ?
For you?
Excellent idea.
Yes. I reckon he means you not adding your relentless trivia means silence for us all. Now that's speculation.
-
Apr 13, 2014 5:44 AM in response to gumsieby Csound1,As I do not speculate, or tell others when and what they should post you will understand when I ignore you.
But if you have any fact to add to this post go right ahead,
-
Apr 13, 2014 6:22 PM in response to Gerrit7by Toack,Thing is, is there any valid reason to make iCloud sync mandatory?, oh apple, you have lost all my love for you.
-
Apr 13, 2014 6:49 PM in response to Toackby Chris CA,Toack wrote:
Thing is, is there any valid reason to make iCloud sync mandatory?
Since local sync was removed, yes.
-
Apr 13, 2014 8:24 PM in response to Chris CAby Matt Schultz,Chris CA wrote:
Toack wrote:
Thing is, is there any valid reason to make iCloud sync mandatory?
Since local sync was removed, yes.
That is an illogical response, equivalent to saying the Indians had to be slaughtered since the soldiers left the fort anyway. Absurdity at it's finest.
It always struck me as foolish, vapid and wasteful to send signals across multifarious servers positioned on the worldwide internet and have Apple support thousands upon thousands of machines in huge air-conditioned & power-managed buildings in different parts of the country - all to sync two devices sitting less than a quarter of an inch from each other.
-
Apr 13, 2014 8:54 PM in response to Matt Schultzby jayv.,Don't forget a lot of this stuff is (also) simply to show other companies, shareholders and the world that Apple is just as technologically 'advanced' as competitors are etc. It's a show. They can do it, so can we. 'We have x-amount of users'. Boasting metrics and green data-centers is something a lot of people care more about than privacy unfortunately.
-
Apr 14, 2014 2:00 AM in response to Matt Schultzby Csound1,Matt Schultz wrote:
Chris CA wrote:
Toack wrote:
Thing is, is there any valid reason to make iCloud sync mandatory?
Since local sync was removed, yes.
That is an illogical response, equivalent to saying the Indians had to be slaughtered since the soldiers left the fort anyway. Absurdity at it's finest.
It always struck me as foolish, vapid and wasteful to send signals across multifarious servers positioned on the worldwide internet and have Apple support thousands upon thousands of machines in huge air-conditioned & power-managed buildings in different parts of the country - all to sync two devices sitting less than a quarter of an inch from each other.
I find having to plug in order to sync rather antediluvian, and destructive to my workflow (which takes me around the world). All that extra travel is wasteful of time and energy.
-
Apr 14, 2014 2:30 AM in response to Matt Schultzby peter_watt,If you calculate how much CO2 and methane would be produced by 300 million humans waiting ten minutes for itunes to churn you might find the carbon footprint of a modern data farm favourably comparable.
-
Apr 14, 2014 9:33 AM in response to peter_wattby gumsie,Yeah, er......not sure about that. Data centres are my field and I can tell you they waste massive amounts of energy. Truly massive amounts on necessary evils like physical and virtual security before you even begin to consider other factors.