I'm not trying to be difficult, I genuinely did not understand what you meant and it seemed like a contradiction. I completely agree (and understand) your further explanation, that's all I was asking for. Thank you. Nonverbal communication can be deceiving, and I mean no offense by this, but your tone is decidedly aggressive.
To clarify the focus of this discussion board, we (myself included) have found a unique problem in Mavericks in which, through no fault of our own, all but the bottom corner of a window is located off-screen. If the top of a window is off the screen, one cannot use the common vector function "click+drag" at the top of the window as many people are probably accustomed to doing, because the cursor cannot go passed the confines of the screen. Therefore, it requires an innovative solution, which you (and I independently) found could be accomplished by three-finger-dragging (3FD) and kudos! It's a great solution that can help many people out of a disconcerting predicament. I hope others found this solution as useful as I did.
So, are there other vectors that can move a window without the user being able to click on anything but the bottom right corner? I think that information could be really useful, especially in this context.
In the meantime, consider this: at no point did I say, or even imply that 3FD is the only way to do this function, nor did I address why using this method works. I didn't imply that it only works in this situation or that it is the only way to move windows... but I'm glad to see you heartily disagreeing with what other people didn't say. And if you are concerned about being misquoted, you could always use proper grammar to avoid confusion–periods end sentences, commas attach subordinate clauses. You could even use an m-dash for emphasis if you want. This is just a suggestion, and if you feel I misquoted you, I am sorry, that wasn't my intent.