Hi jpl,
Not meaning to intrude, but your post seems to suggest that serial and parallel ATA drives are sorta compatible. Well, I've had no experience of notebook versions of SATA drives (I've used a MacBook Pro, if that helps), but the interface for SATA and PATA drives in desktops is completely different - PATA uses a wide ribbon, whereas SATA runs through a small plug, which are in no way interchangeable. I'd expect that the same kind of connectors have been ported to notebooks, as the laptop versions are just small desktop drives - the 40-pin IDE interface of a standard 3.5" drive has been shrunk to a 44-pin interface, with the wide connector sorting both data and power. I've seen photos of the MBP hard drive, and I think (although unclear) that the small plug interface has been ported onto these kinds of drives.
So, in a nutshell, serial drives are completely incompatible on every level right down to the interface. However, I agree than practically all ATA-6 drives are ATA-5 compliant (although my Hitachi TravelStar IC25N030ARCS04-0 (phew) drive really doesn't like my Pismo, or vice versa). PATA drives have gone the way of the Ni-Cad battery, steam engines and DOS because they're slow and basically obsolete. SATA is far faster and is much better at RAID, but it's more expensive, naturally.
Hope this helps, and adios,
Rob
P.S. The faster SATA interface is named SATA-II and offers either 1.5 or 3Gb/sec - I should know, since my Windows rig has it, but I don't have any SATA drives, so I have no idea what performance is like. Also, please excuse any spelling mistaakes - my Pismo's in the middle of a hard drive clone and I'm typing on the unclipped keyboard.