Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Final Cut 10.1 dual graphics on 5.1

I have tried searching for this. Every comment on the new FCPX 10.1 says it is optimized for dual graphics on the NEW Mac Pro. Well, what about last years model (which I have)? I don't think I can spring for a new Mac Pro right now and was wondering two things. 1. Will FCPX work a lot harder if I put in two graphics cards into my old machine? 2. What two grahics cards would one recommend? I have the 5770 right now and I did try a 7970 in there once, but it really made no difference at all. Please let me know what you know, and thank you!

Mac Pro, OS X Mavericks (10.9.1), Did I mention it also works as a computer?

Posted on Dec 27, 2013 7:48 AM

Reply
8 replies

Dec 28, 2013 8:52 AM in response to mclarenf1

i've tried 2 5770, works fine.

1 5770: 1 track 4K 25p playback better quality no frame drop

1 track 4k 50p playback better quality frame drop

2 5770: 1 track 4K 50p playback better quality no frame drop (no a/v output)

1 track 4k 25p playback better quality frame drop (a/v output 4k 25p by aja kona 3g)


i've tried 2 k5000, 2 cards don't make sense.


1 k5000 render time=2 k5000 render time

Dec 29, 2013 4:01 AM in response to mclarenf1

for xavc 50p,the fcpx use mainly cpu.

this is unlike prores422,

xavc50p can be 2 tracks video and 4 tracks text realtime with 1 5770 card

at better performance option.

in fact you will see little image quality loss

when choose this option.

this also prove decoding xavc uses cpu!

the brucex's test is not overall.

that test is almost use gpu,cause the project

is using fcpx generate text clouds etc.

however, if you render a dissolve of xavc clips,

1 5770 takes only 1/28 more time than 2 5770


here is the list i've done:

encoding 4k 50p xavc to prores 32s clip

1 5770 39s 2 5770 29s 1 k5000 50+s(i can't remember)


render 10s dissolve 4k xavc 50p

1 5770 29s. 2 5770 28s. 1k5000 35s



brucex test output prores

1 5770 64s. 2 5770 38s. 1k5000 about65s(not remember)


render 10s 4k xavc 50p gauss blur

2 5770 almost= 1 k5000


realtime play 4k 50p xavc

2 video tracks both primary colorgade

with4 tracsk text(with simple animated color block behind the text)

1 5770= 2 5770= 1 k5000

all can output 3g sdi 1080p50 to monitor

image quality: better performance almost= better quality


realtime playback 4kprores50p at high quality:

1 5770 drop frame

2 5770 dont drop

1 k5000 dont drop

but if ouput to sony monitor all drop frame

image quality:better performance << better quality

Final Cut 10.1 dual graphics on 5.1

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.