Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Advice on new MacPro 2013/14 please

Well Ive spec'd out my new mac pro but have come right up against my budget, and now im forced to make a decision which I'd like your thoughts on please.


Firstly my reason for this purchase is Primarily for latest versions of FINAL CUT PRO X & MOTION. Secondary (and buy some distance) Adobe After FX & PS.


My Choice of Machine:


8 Core

32GB RAM

1TB SSD

D700 Graphics


MY QUESTION: Id like to go for 64GB RAM but is not possible on my budget. All things (above) considered, would I be sacrificing FCPX perfomance if I drop down to the D500 graphics but boost my RAM to 64GB?


thanks in advance.

OS X Mavericks (10.9.1), 8GB/500GB HDD/GeForce GT 330M/TNT!

Posted on Jan 1, 2014 1:16 PM

Reply
3 replies

Jan 1, 2014 1:59 PM in response to StingRay67

3rd party RAM from Crucial, OWC and others is already available for sale.


http://www.crucial.com/store/listparts.aspx?model=Mac%20Pro%20%28Late%202013%29

http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1660838


FCP X 10.1, Motion 5.1 Updates w/Dual GPU Support (new Mac Pros) (from Thursday)
Apple released Final Cut Pro X 10.1 Thursday with support for Dual GPUs in the new Mac Pro and more. Long list in the Final Cut Pro X 10.1 Release Notes that also links to info on How to back up important FCP X 10.0.x files before updating. (Today's Apple docs listing also has more related to Final Cut Pro X 10.1.)
Also out today are Compressor 4.1 and Motion 5.1. Full release notes below but here's a clip from the App store Motion 5.1 changes:


Optimized playback and rendering using dual GPUs in the new Mac Pro


I think it is almost a toss-up on the 8-core or save and go for 6-core.

This is a quote from Marco:


You can also see why I don’t recommend the 12-core model to anyone except those whose software will definitely make very good use of all of its cores, at least most of the time — because for any other conditions, it’ll be slower than the others.


On paper, and these Geekbench results from the 6- and 8-core support this, it looks like you really can’t go wrong with any of the CPU options below the 12-core — the deciding factors should only be cost and how much parallelism you can take advantage of.


It looks like you’re paying a lot for slower clock speeds as the cores increase, but that’s not the entire story. Those weird Turbo Boost numbers, which are easy to pull from here and here, are worth understanding before choosing a modern Intel processor.


http://www.marco.org/2013/11/26/new-mac-pro-cpus


Mac Pro 2013 6-core Geekbench Scores

http://www.marco.org/2013/11/05/geekbench-mac-pro-hexcore


(2013) Mac Pro review


2013 Mac Pro review: small, fast and in a league of its own (engadget)

Tested: New Mac Pro is the speedster we've been waiting for (finally)


You probably are not locked into a graphic device.


Apple hasn't officially stated GPUs are upgradable, but the general concensus based on the design is that you'll likely be able to change the GPU. But agreed that's not for certain.

http://www.besttechie.com/2013/12/25/can-you-upgrade-the-parts-of-a-new-mac-pro/

http://www.macworld.com/article/2082515/mac-pro-late-2013-review-apples-new-mac- pro-really-is-for-pros.html?page=2

Advice on new MacPro 2013/14 please

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.