Non-retina Hi-Res (1680x1050) MBP 15" vs. Retina MBP 15"
Hi, I have this question as an additional question within my other topic, but then decided to start a separate discussion (for clarity).
Which one would be suggested for Non-Photo/Movie Editor, but rather for an average user:
Option #1: Non-Retina MBP 15" (mid-2012), Hi-Res (1680x1050) anti-glare, i7-2.7Ghz, RAM=8GB, HDD=1TB, Video=1GB (RAM, HDD and battery can be upgraded/replaced easily, has Optical Drive)
Option #2: Retina MBP 15" (early-2013), i7-2.7Ghz, RAM=16GB, SSD=500GB, Video=1GB (nothing can be changed/upgraded, No Optical Drive).
Both of them are Refurbished. The price-wise - those seems to be the same (although #1 seems to be slighly more expencive than #2 :S)).
Sounds like #1 give you good enough resolution, and option to upgrade to SSD (once it goes down in price in 1-2 years), while in the mean time gives a lot of storage. Should not have issue with most Apps still do not support Retina. But would be 0.5 kg heavier.
MacBook Pro