Timecode stripping

I spent the last half hour going through all my books and looking at all the tabs/drop downs in FCP 4.5 and can't remember/find how to strip a tape (lay down timecodes) to my mini DV Deck. Thanks for the help.

G5 dual 2.5 Mac OS X (10.3.9) FCP 4.5HD

Posted on Sep 1, 2006 9:47 PM

Reply
14 replies

Sep 2, 2006 8:22 AM in response to Patrick Sheffield

It was my understanding that if I took a blank tape put in into my camera shot for a while took it out and then placed it back in to continue where I left off in the tape that the time code would go back to zero. On the other hand if I was to blank the tape first I wouldn't have the same problem. The timecode would be continuous throughtout the tape. Am I wrong?

G5 dual 2.5

Sep 2, 2006 9:42 AM in response to lcourpet

This is correct. It's possible you might get a little bit of a tiimecode jump at the spot where you resume shooting, but it should be an ascending jump which should be fine as long as you give yourself sufficient time at the beginning of the shot to account for preroll when capturing. Remember to assure timecode accuracy of captured clips besure and have "abort capture on dropped frames" and "create new clip on timecode break" enabled.

Sep 2, 2006 9:57 AM in response to lcourpet

Blacking a tape was common practice in the days of analog tape when cameras could do 'insert' recording; you could lay down the timecode track (aka: blacking) and then record video and audio on the remaining tracks without disturbing the timecode.

Most consumer, prosumer and professional digital camcorders no longer do insert recording, so pre-blacking a tape is useless. When your camcorder is in record mode, the tape is erased BEFORE it reaches the record heads. So your black & code is gone - replaced by the camcorder's recording.

The only real result you get from pre-blacking/stripping a tape prior to recording is that you've put one pass on the tape: it's no longer virgin tape.

You can achieve unbroken timecode when shooting by making sure you have sufficient pre and post roll before and after each shot.

-DH

Sep 2, 2006 10:02 AM in response to David Harbsmeier

David, it seems many people have a problem making sure they have contiinuous signal with DV cameras. The DP I work with (and he's been working for many many years - he was actually one of the original shooters on Woodstock) couldn't do it until I seriously threatened bodily harm. And w'ere working with the Panasonic DVX100 which actually has a button that will automatically position the tape so there is continous ascending timecode. Blacking the tape should give you consistent ascending timecode which will allow you to successfully batch capture an entire tape. I agree that it shouldn't be necessary, but for many people it

Sep 2, 2006 2:12 PM in response to Michael Grenadier

You will still get a glitch at the off point if they roll past it before starting again. Blacking a tape is no insurance against that. Also, since it is an assemble edit, if the tape speed is even slightyl off between the time the tape was blacked and the time it is recorded (temp difference, different deck, etc), there will be a difference in the timecode between the blacking and the recording.

There is a reason for blacking tapes like DigiBeta - where you will be inserting material. I still say blacking DV tapes is no insurance against tc glitches...

Patrick

User uploaded file

Sep 2, 2006 10:02 PM in response to Michael Grenadier

Quite the contrary Michael! On all the tapes shot with Sony HVR-Z1 that I receive for capture from different shooters the timecode breaks every time they stop shooting. True, they rewind quite often to take a look at the taped material on the LCD screen, then they shoot again. The timecode always, I repeat, always jumps back to zero and those guys have no idea of pre- or post-roll. I like the suggestion of one of previous posters that beating up one of the DPs may help. FCP assigns a new roll number every time it finds zero timecode point, on one of tapes the count went to D09-T, meaning D09 was the original roll number and then FCP went A, B, C... T!

Sep 3, 2006 4:20 AM in response to Michael Grenadier

You are right actually. When I capture miniDV tapes with broken timecode from my own Canon camcorder I never feel the temptation to go physical because the process is much smoother when I work with HDV tapes from the Sony. Although the timecode stops at points when I had switched off the camera, in DV it goes on eventually, after a few seconds delay. In HDV, it starts from zero. And the delay is painfully long.

Sep 3, 2006 7:49 AM in response to Michael Grenadier

But it's extremely unlikely the timecode will reset to 0 isn't it? At worst you'll get a timecode jump and lose a few seconds of preroll. Or am I wrong? < </div>

You know, as long as we've had our Sony 150 and 170, I still cannot figure out what causes resets to 00:00:00:00 or what we can do to ensure continuous timecode over a long day's shoot that involves shutting down and possibly removing a tape for review or to insert a different reel.

When we converted to DV from Beta, we tried everything including blacking the tapes (The recording format does NOT benefit from pre-blacking. You're laying down pieces of a digital file, not a linear analog signal.) The results of our extensive tests were goofy; no consistency that we could see.

bogiesan

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Timecode stripping

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.