Need two things in Shake 4.1

Okay I purchased Shake 4.1 recently. I have a PVR hooked up to my iMac Intel Duo. I've got some footage on VHS that I'm gonna import through the PVR, which will record the footage onto the computer in DIVX format. I will import that into Shake 4.1.

This is what I need. The footage on the screen only occupies about two thirds of the screen so I need to blow it up, magnify it so it covers the entire screen.

Secondly, I need to know how I can distort the video, change the shape and size of different elements in the picture, which will have these different elements overlapping one another and not just one clearly distorted portion which affects the rest of the picture.

If you can point me toward any particular tutorial that would help too. I'm looking for the means to show this transformation in the middle of the footage. Like, imagine a car in a driveway suddenly doubling in size during the course of the video. The driveway doesn't get any bigger, only the car.

Any ideas?

iMac Intel Duo, Mac OS X (10.4.6)

Posted on Sep 12, 2006 11:27 AM

Reply
14 replies

Sep 12, 2006 12:35 PM in response to mpstjohn

You are kind of asking a $30,000 watch to tell you if the sun's going to come up tomorrow.

First, tell me a bit more of the PVR... got a link to your model?

Here's what I'd do...

Buy yourself Quicktime Pro and convert the DIVX stuff to Quicktime DV/NTSC. This will assure you as best quality full screen version of the file as you can get.

THEN - import those files into iMovie and make your croppings... I think you can do that in iMovie... or FCPExpress.

Shake isn't an editor... it is a compositor. Getting yourself FCPExpress or even trying this all in iMovie will be MUCH better.

However - Shake will take whatever size you give it and make that the operating size for the node. So - if you bring in 640x480 -- then your node will reflect that.

You can RESIZE (node) if you want... not sure why... but if you want to ZOOM or SCALE then try using the SCALE node (or what I like to use) the Move2D... that way you can scale AND pan it as needed.

Let's see if that gets you where you want to go first... then ask some more questions.

CaptM

Sep 12, 2006 1:06 PM in response to Captain Mench

Thanks.

Here is a link to the manufacturer's page...
http://www.miglia.com/products/video/evolutiontv/index.html

"You are kind of asking a $30,000 watch to tell you if the sun's going to come up tomorrow."

That's essentially the same response I get to every post I have here. It turns out again and again I'm trying to push either the software or the media beyond its means.

I own Final Cut Pro 5.0, but was hoping to do this entirely in Shake, I suppose that's not possible. I was told when zooming in on footage I would get better quality with Shake than Final Cut Pro 5 though.

Thanks for your help so far.

Any word on distorting the proportion of elements of the picture, say in a transformation scene? Again I want to refer to the analogy with the car in a driveway doubling in size while the driveway itself doesn't become larger, leaving the size of the car to overlap the surface of the driveway.

Sep 12, 2006 3:36 PM in response to mpstjohn

I'll need to take another look at the link you sent...

I don't think you want to push this app beyond it's capabilities...

For doubling the car... you'll need to rotoshape the car out and then below that use a scale node (or again, Move2D) to resize over time.

Not that it can't be done... THIS is what shake thrives on. Just time consuming.

Good luck,

CaptM

Sep 13, 2006 6:25 AM in response to Captain Mench

I didn't mean I was intentionally trying to push the software beyond it's means. Its just a tendency I have to expect more from something high-end stuff like Shake or Final Cut Pro than it can actually accomplish. I have to face the fact that Shake isn't much more than a compositor and FCP not much more than an editing suite. Though in the case of Shake there is a little bit more there, and that's what I intend to focus on here.

Are there any other programs that would be good for warping elements of a video. After Effects? Discreet Combustion? Re:Map? Autodesk Toxik? Photoshop CS 2?

Perhaps software that exists solely to warp these elements?

Sep 13, 2006 7:23 AM in response to mpstjohn

Look --

Proper planning on your part and all...

You want to do this? Shoot a driveway -- shoot a car on a green screen.

Put them together.

Don't want to do that? Do it in shake with rotoscoping. Or yes, go buy any other program you want. Still going to be the same thing.

You seem to have a little chip on your shoulder about these two programs. I might suggest you try something else. For what it's worth... they'll do what you want... IF you plan it properly.

I have NO idea what you really want to do, but from the sounds of it you aren't anywhere close to using these programs professionally -- DIVX?? VHS???

Come on.

CaptM

Sep 13, 2006 7:43 AM in response to Captain Mench

Sorry if I ****** you off there. It wasn't my intention. I don't have a chip on my shoulder about these programs at all. I'm just not as educated about these things, and apologize if my ignorance has made you angry or impatient with my ever persisting incompetence.

The source material is not something I filmed but a preview from an animated show whose particular episode hasn't been released on DVD yet. So the source material has to be VHS because that was how I recorded it at the time. I don't see the point of transferring it to DVD from VHS, it will be the same quality, right?

Anyway, thank you for the tip on rotoscoping, I will do that. I suppose there are other programs that would be better for warping, I can't locate any in particular, but you don't seem to want to give that information since I suppose its not Shake-related and you think I'm just here to slam the software, which I'm not. As I said before, I'm ignorant to what this stuff is truly capable of, but do not dislike it.

None the less, I appreciate your help so far, and apologize if my ill-planning has upset you, I'm sure you have people who, in writing clear and more concise questions deserve your answers more. No sarcasm here. Thank you for your help so far, I'll just keep googling 'warp effects'. I don't want any bad blood between us here so again, I apologize. Sorry.

Sep 13, 2006 7:54 AM in response to mpstjohn

Here's the deal.

1) Why would somebody pay $1200 for an editing software when they are using divx and vhs material?

2) Why would somebody pay an additional $500 for a program like Shake?

3) Why would someone who paid over $1700 for a set of programs want to rip off someone else's material? Is it YOURS?

Now -- let's assume you DID pay for these and didn't download them.

Read the manual in FCP about a warp effect.

Read the manual in Shake about the Warp node!!

Both of those will get you started.

BTW - the point of these forums is to help you thru issues you might be having with your software... NOT do something for you that you should be looking for yourself. Read up on the warp node... try it... then come back and I'll answer specific issues you might be having.

I'm not blank blanked off... I'm trying to blank blank you off enough to read the manual even a little.

Good luck,

CaptM

Sep 13, 2006 8:39 AM in response to Captain Mench

Thank you. I wasn't even aware the word they blanked out was considered a curse word. Sorry about that. What I meant to say, without using a word that evidently was vulgar (I didn't know it was), 'I evidently made you angry. Sorry.'

Final Cut Pro 5 (eBay $250)
Shake 4.1 (eBay $195)

I paid for these programs after seeing something on www.ytmnd.com. They take footage from tv shows, commercials, movies and splice together footage, inserting characters from different franchises together and such. Its pretty nifty stuff if you avoid the occassional dirty punchline.

I just bought the Apple Pro Training Series book for Shake. Thanks for your help so far. And sorry, in the same sense that until recently I didn't know you could use rotoscoping to help emulate the shallow depth of field of a 35mm camera you could use the warp feature to warp a picture for a transformation scene. Its less of a matter of my ignorance as far as the manual as it is the definition of the term itself, warp. For example thinking that when someone uses rotoscoping they're gonna go for a Scanner Darkly look to their film. Its not necessarily true. I suppose I should of wikipedia'ed the term 'warp' and see how it is defined by the people who put together the Shake or FCP program.

I'll try to avoid these forums until I survey every manual I can get my hands on for this software. Thanks for your help, have a nice day.

Sep 13, 2006 8:58 AM in response to mpstjohn

You are being a lot nicer than I am.

I appreciate that. Now -- since you are being straight up... I'll help as much as I can.

(Not sure where my crass attitude comes from these days - happens too often it seems.)

Again, I'm not exactly sure what you want to do with the particular footage you have in mind.

For the car example -- I would create a rotoshape around the car and then use the scale node for it... warp might give you a different look... kind of a warp look. If you know what I mean.

Good luck,

CaptM

Sep 13, 2006 9:38 AM in response to Captain Mench

I admit there's more things I'm trying to do here, but in regards to this particular example its just a starting point for a larger project. I'm trying to cut together a Simpsons clip that will be a little less than five minutes long. It would take warping and rotoscoping together different sources, some available on high def source (like DVD) and others only lower (VHS or limewire download).

I was hoping I could get around having to re-draw some of the material. If I have to I can get a hold of an inexpensive version of Toon Boom Studio 3.0, (an XP version which means I'll be exporting my animation through Parallel Desktop, which would still be cheaper than buying the Mac OS X Version). But if I can avoid having to redraw a lot of the material I will obviously. And then there is the matter of the accuracy of the rotoscoping. I was hoping I wouldn't have to get a copy of Ultimatte AdvantEdge to further insure the accuracy of the rotoscope. But Shake may pull that off fine anyway, I'll see.

But essentially, now I know better what I have to do since your earlier explanation, I'll be taking characters from one source, let's say one episode and once they're rotoscoped placing them in the context of a scene from another source (another episode) I'll be warping if I can really achieve the proportion of certain elements of the scene and, if not, redrawing them in Toon Boom and exporting those animations to Shake (boy that's a lot of work). There's not just the matter of the changing of size but other characteristics of a character, which will probably mean redrawing some material.

I realize I'm being vague on a couple of points here, but I'm more explaining this for the sake of explanation than for you to come up with further solutions for my problems. 'One step at a time' I say. As much as I enjoy reading, technical writing bores me to tears so maybe I'll just get a tutorial dvd from www.thegnomonworkshop.com instead.

So this is what you have told me so far.

Rotoscope the elements for which I wish to change.

Warp these elements once they're rotoscoped.

I can either export the clips into Toon Boom and edit the material manually (redrawing it) or I can animate something separately in Toon Boom and export that to Shake.

I realize that given I'm talking about software other than Shake it may be falling out of the realm of your expertise, so just so you know Toon Boom Studio is essentially a lower level version of the program studio use to draw and animate cartoons (think Maya but only two dimensional).

There's no need for you to respond at this point, unless you want to. I've had enough explained to me that I can assume you know, I'm not sure what your expertise is as far as what lies outside the realm of this particular software, and what I'm doing may seem impossible or downright weird. I'm not really asking for an explaination anymore, you've given me a point to start off at and from there its really up to what I can get from either the people who designed the Parallel Desktop software or Toon Boom software to know what those can and cannot do. Or maybe I can use the Quick Paint feature on Shake. I'll have to look into that too.

So thank you. You've gotten me started. It was much appreciated.

Sep 21, 2006 4:06 PM in response to mpstjohn

This was bound to happen sooner or later when Shake was reduced to $500. Everybody and their Mom that thinks they are interested in filmaking will hear that Shake composited Star Wars and King kong, then think they are going to go throw their video of the kids b-day party into the thing, hit the magic "jedi" button, and you will mysteriously have lightsaber fighting Jedi all over the place.

Big houses like ILM plan every last step in the film shoot for the exact specific effect they are trying to achieve. They do not go haphazardly throwing any old piece of footage into a piece of software like Shake, and expect it to do ANYTHING, much less what you are looking for.

The reality of Shake is that it is the furthest thing from a consumer product, and although its affordable in price, most people cannot afford the time and skills it takes to use the software. Although some products like After effects might have some "one button" plugins for certain effects, they do not work without proper planning either, but if your looking for that kind of response from shake, man, are you in the wrong place. Shake is a compositor, and one that needs EVERY DETAIL to be told to it, thats where its power lies, and only those willing to invest the time, and significant time that is, will even be able to harness 5% of what Shake is all about.

Here is someone trying to capture footage from a DVR into shake like its an #%#&^# Tivo or something, and he wants to know why it aint working.

Everyone that owns a computer owns some sort of word processor, but barely any of them attempt to write a novel. Why does the general public get access to some high end tools like shake, and all of a sudden think they are George Lucas?

Sep 22, 2006 4:47 AM in response to Captain Mench

Its scary. Ya know, Apple is partly to blame here. I walked into the Apple Store the other day, and there is Shake sitting on the shelf now. (its was never there when it was priced at $3000). It was also loaded onto every machine in the store. Who are they selling these things to? Mall moms that come in for an ipod ? "Oh by the way, would you like a copy of shake also?"

I love Apple, and I love most everything they do, but this is a bit dissappointing, the way they are painting the view of Shake, and what I think the future holds for the product. I can't believe they took such a widely used high end product, and just killed it. Maybe they have some "super Shake" up their sleeve, but I wouldnt be surprised if it turns into Motion 3.0 or something like that.

Sep 22, 2006 8:11 AM in response to mpstjohn

I own Final Cut Pro 5.0, but was hoping to do this
entirely in Shake, I suppose that's not possible. I
was told when zooming in on footage I would get
better quality with Shake than Final Cut Pro 5
though.


You're refering to the optical flow engine. In the Timing subtab of the FileIn node, click on reTiming: Convert, and then set your new resolution. Move2D and Zoom or Resize nodes use standard filtering. The Convert function actually does some weird optical flow math to make it look great. Start with that, then work on your layering. Because the op flo takes a bit of calculation time, I'd probably render it out first.
Any word on distorting the proportion of elements of
the picture, say in a transformation scene? Again I
want to refer to the analogy with the car in a
driveway doubling in size while the driveway itself
doesn't become larger, leaving the size of the car to
overlap the surface of the driveway.


Draw a roto of the car, plug the footage into a switchmatte with the roto in the second input. Then apply a Move2D and move it around wherever you want over the background image.

-ed

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Need two things in Shake 4.1

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.