Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Sony Alpha ILCE-6000 raw compatibility

Hello,


Does someone know when the Sony Alpha ILCE-6000 raw compatibility will come ?

It's a few month now this camera is available and Aperture doesn't seem to be able to treat that RAW.


Thank you for helping me.

MCCHPS.


OS X 10.9.4

Aperture 3.5.1

Posted on Jul 11, 2014 10:38 AM

Reply
27 replies

Jul 22, 2014 12:10 AM in response to MCCHPS

Hi all,


the situation is very unsatisfactory ... even you know some more details:


1) with the OSX 10.9.3 update Aperture can read RAWs from the Alpha 6000 (as well the Alpha 5000), but the result is an overexposed picture (see e.g. http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/53734631).


2) other commercial tools like LR 5.4 support the camera (since ~ April this year).


3) even the free raw converters can handle the Alpha 6000 raw.


If one digs deeper into this:


a) you will discover that the input plug-in file in the 10.9.3 apple camera raw update is accidentally for a different camera model ... there are included correction tables for ISO steps that the 6000er is not capable (50,64,80,100,... the alpha 6000 starts at 100), this explains somehow the overexposure.


b) for the free tools the community uses the input plug-in files which are foreseen for the NEX-5N ...


c) ... because they discovered that the commercial tools are doing the same. If you compare the plug-in files in Lightroom designated for the alpha 6000 you will see the same content in the files for the NEX-5N


So it would be easy to patch this really quickly ...


Please Apple awake !!!


Best regards,
Frank

Jul 22, 2014 1:58 AM in response to adder79

Hi Adder79,


not quite the same ... unfortunately the a77MKII is even not include with a wrong input plug-in. If you have a look into following directory on your mac:


/System/Library/CoreServices/RawCameraSupport.bundle/Contents/Resources/Plugins. zip


You will find some: arw.sony.xzy.cam


Where xyz represents a camera code which is specific to SONY. You can look up this number here:


http://owl.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/Sony.html


..

(contained in the Plugins.zip)

311 = ILCE-7R

312 = ILCE-6000

313 = ILCE-5000

(not contained)

317 = DSC-RX100M3

318 = ILCE-7S

319 = ILCA-77M2


So Aperture will not handle the cameras with the last three codes with the current raw camera support version (5.05)


best regards,

Frank

Jul 22, 2014 2:09 AM in response to fsl2014

Hi,


I investigated a little amount of time to following tool:


http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/


With that I did try to outsmart Aperture. Aperture seems to lookup the "Maker" SonyModelID. Therefore I ran on a terminal for a given Alpha 6000 RAW:


exiftool -SonyModelID=NEX-5N DSC00307.ARW


That patched ARW file reads in to Aperture and the overexposure is gone. Unfortunately the geometry of RAW is in a 5N different compared to the 6000 (4912x3264 vs 6000x4000) which appears in Aperture with some crop.


Therefore I started a different approach and used the NEX-7 as SonyModelID. That gave a better result and also the overexposure is gone. I did not compare the colours in detail and I cannot say which SonyModelID fits better colour wise.


And of cause this is only a workaround. But it shows evidence that LR and others worked only with a little bit of luck ... and dare that they have the perfect input plug-in when using the NEX-5N one.


best regards,

Frank

Jul 22, 2014 2:15 AM in response to fsl2014

Hello,


You were right, the pictures appear as too much overexposed.

But IF you look into Aperture and the lasts raw-updates, you wonÂŽt see the A6000 listed.

SOme other Sony models yes, like the RX100, etc.


That mean, in my opinion, those new A6000 aren't expected yet. Maybe the RAW of the RX100 and the A6000 are closer, but not exactly The same.


So, as a Universal wish :-) : Apple, can you work for this, pleaaaaaaase ?! Fix it quicly, you're able to do it, we know.

WE all agree with this : we would like to keep working under Aperture and not going away to LR or other non-Apple software.


Thank you very much.

Jul 22, 2014 2:24 AM in response to MCCHPS

MCCHPS,


you are right there are not officially listed, but the needed files are present.


That makes me fear, that they oversee that all and in a next release (5.06) the mess is still there.


But unfortunately I did not find any channel (which is responsive) to communicate this. Even the recommendation to put it here:


http://www.apple.com/feedback/aperture.html


... seems to be more like a "black hole"


Frank

Jul 22, 2014 2:34 AM in response to adder79

Sorry I was a bit "close" with information:


Download the DMG for a Mac here:


http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/


The OS X package installs the ExifTool command-line application and libraries in /usr/bin. After installing, type "

exiftool
" in a Terminal window to run exiftool and read the application documentation.


At least you should be familiar with a Mac terminal which you find in the launchpad, search for Terminal.


In this terminal: change to the directory where you raw is located (for a test copy one ARW to some directory) and than type in the terminal:


cd /Users/xxx/some_directory

exiftool -SonyModelID=SLT-A77 the_name_of_your.ARW


That will modify a single ARW file. It will make a copy as well. I do not know about the quality when importing afterwards, because there was a change in the camera in do not know how that reflects to this hack. It is just a workaround ... not more.


Best regards,

Frank

Sony Alpha ILCE-6000 raw compatibility

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.