- I realise that iPhoto is no longer actively developed. But (1) so what,
So it's unlikely that a feature request will be acted on at this point. That's what.
(2) the rest of the world isn't standing still so why should Apple users have to accept sub-par functions "just because"?
Well: a: neither is Apple, they're developing a new application and b: sub par why? Because this one feature isn't there for you? Really? One very minor never requested feature?
I also realise that Aperture is no longer being developed. So it suggests that Apple weren't really proud of their stuff - most other companies never do this, just dumping BOTH their image editing tools, the one that comes for free and the one you have to pay for.
No, that suggests that you have a tendency to grab the wrong end of the stick and make unjustifiable inferences. Apple are finishing with iPhoto and Aperture and rolling them into a new app. Neither apps comes for free, btw. The current version of iPhoto is included in the price of a new Mac but an upgrade requires a purchase.
Here are some facts which Apple should ponder I think:
- many cameras allow the user to go from one image to the next while remaining at a given zoom level. So why lose this functionality once on your Mac?
Many cameras don't. Many cameras allow you to attach lenses, why lose that functionality once on your Mac? Where does it stop?
- even the basic photo editing tool in Windows, whatever its name is, allows this
Good for it. But that's not an editing feature, it's a viewing feature. You know, when you choose a piece of software for a task you decide the features that are important to you and select the software that gets closest to what you want. No software does it all. If that's such a key feature for you then iPhoto will never be the app for you.