So that would be no? You can't name one specific thing that i have excluded myself from? I didn't think so.
So here is the actual text of the statute you keep referring to (in CAPS!) but obviously have never read:
Access Verification
At a parent's request, operators must disclose the general kinds of personal information they collect online from children (for example, name, address, telephone number, email address, hobbies), as well as the specific information collected from children who visit their sites. Operators must use reasonable procedures to ensure they are dealing with the child's parent before they provide access to the child's specific information.
They can use a variety of methods to verify the parent's identity, including:
- obtaining a signed form from the parent via postal mail or facsimile;
- accepting and verifying a credit card number;
- taking calls from parents on a toll-free telephone number staffed by trained personnel;
- email accompanied by digital signature;
- email accompanied by a PIN or password obtained through one of the verification methods above.
Operators who follow one of these procedures acting in good faith to a request for parental access are protected from liability under federal and state law for inadvertent disclosures of a child's information to someone who purports to be a parent.
http://www.coppa.org/comply.htm
You will notice that there are many methods listed to verify the parent's identity. Apple *chooses* to follow one and only one of them.
I would suggest in the future you do your homework before weighing in on subjects that you aren't fully familiar with. I understand that you, personally, can't do anything about this situation (except repeat the same misinformation and act superior) but instead you could help bring this conversation to the attention of real Apple representatives who may be able to provide some relief. Thank you.