josephine280 wrote:
I am NOT arguing that objects don't bend by themselves. I'm not sure why you think you need to explain laws of physics to me -- just to sound belittling in general or because my handle name is female? I put the quote in to demonstrate what you asked me to demonstrate. You claimed to have never said that I claimed no pressure was involved, so I showed you the quote and THEN you did it again. You attempted to make my position sound ridiculous by arguing against something I never argued in the first place. That's an oldie. You should consider finding new argumentative fallacies.
Thanks for reminding me why I never reach out to people on forums. I'll leave now, and you can reclaim your throne. Go ahead and post about how I'm ranting, or deluded, or uneducated about physics. It doesn't change the facts. Consumer Reports said that there was much less pressure required to bend the phone at the volume buttons. As for a significant percentage, we'll never know about that, since Apple has refused to update the actual numbers. You have no idea what the percentage is.
I could not care less what your gender is. Ignorance and irrationality are not confined to any specific gender. The fact that you're choosing to focus on that as a possible issue is a problem on your side, not on mine. I never made any reference to your gender. Therefore, your comment about your gender shows more about you and your preconceived notions and expectations than it does about me.
And no, Consumer reports said that while there was less pressure needed to cause damage on an iPhone 6 than on a previous model, it was still within acceptable tolerances. And they even acknowledged that a large surface area, using the same materials, will be relatively weaker. That's like saying that steel is less durable than diamond. Technically true, but that doesn't make steel a weak material.
Consumer Reports found no construction design flaws or manufacturing defects in the units they tested. They simply found that older models were more resistant.
A M1 Abrams Main Battle Tank is more durable and resistant to damage than a semi-truck. That doesn't mean the semi-truck is a 'weak' vehicle in terms of structural integrity.