I WANT them to know they're blocked...

The apparent protocol for a blocked phone number and iMessage is to continue to give the blocked sender a "delivered" message even though I have blocked them on my phone.


This protocol is flawed. I WANT the person to know that I have not received their message. In fact, it seems to me that it is potentially dangerous and makes me liable if iMessage tells a person that I have received a message from them when I have not. For example, they could be sending me critical and important information that I need or that they need me to know. But, since iMessage tells them that their message has been "delivered" when in fact it has not, that's a hole.


Anyone else experience this?

iPhone, iOS 8.1.1

Posted on Dec 10, 2014 7:21 AM

Reply
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Posted on Dec 10, 2014 8:00 AM

I believe in this situation the text is actually delivered but your phone blocks the message from showing up on your screen. If this situation ever showed up in a court case I don't know if you would be held liable simply because their phone shows "delivered." You could make a feature request to Apple for the rare case that people want the other party to know they are blocked. In this case you may just want to send a message to them stating that they are blocked on your phone and any emails, calls, or texts will not come through and they will receive no response.

24 replies
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Dec 10, 2014 8:00 AM in response to Timothy Killian

I believe in this situation the text is actually delivered but your phone blocks the message from showing up on your screen. If this situation ever showed up in a court case I don't know if you would be held liable simply because their phone shows "delivered." You could make a feature request to Apple for the rare case that people want the other party to know they are blocked. In this case you may just want to send a message to them stating that they are blocked on your phone and any emails, calls, or texts will not come through and they will receive no response.

Jun 13, 2017 10:05 PM in response to ohyababy

or if there was a mail rule that could be set to alleviate his issue that maybe someone knew about


The OP was about Messages. Not Mail.


The reality is that providing notice that you have been blocked by a party may lead to unwanted and aggressive behaviour towards the blocker.


If the OP is looking for a mission-critical form of communication with acknowledgements for both sending and receiving, Messages is not it.

Dec 10, 2014 7:50 AM in response to AKRBTN

Trust me when I tell you there are reasons to block a person who you don't want to hear from by text message, but who may be sending you information that if they think you have received, you could be liable for in certain ways.


Apple tells the sender that the message has been "delivered." This is incorrect information. A blocked message is not being delivered, but Apple says it has been. The sending party then has a reasonable belief that the message has been received (it says "Delivered") when, in fact, the message has NOT been received.


This is a flawed protocol.

Dec 10, 2014 8:04 AM in response to anypats

While I appreciate the response, liability can span all manner of situations, not just strictly legal.


Again, this is a simple protocol. A blocked sender will receive a "delivered" message when in fact the message is NOT being delivered.


This is flawed. If a message is marked "delivered" and it is "not delivered" then this is an error.


Right? In which Universe of messaging protocols should a message which has not been delivered be marked as delivered?

Nov 8, 2016 7:14 PM in response to cc8988

There is a world of difference between "delivered" and "received"


Using a postal analogy... the post service drops your "letter" in the recipient's mailbox. They have delivered the letter. That the receiving party is not checking their mailbox for mail does not change that.


The post office can rightly claim they have delivered the message, but shouldn't claim it has been received.

Dec 10, 2014 8:44 AM in response to stevejobsfan0123

There are reasons for which that suggestion isn't appropriate.


This is a technical flaw.


Apple's iMessage system indicates messages as being "delivered" when in fact those messages are not delivered.


Am I wrong about this? Is Apple's system working correctly? Are the messages being delivered to the end user in the manner in which a sender has a reasonable belief that they have been?

Nov 8, 2016 12:50 PM in response to Timothy Killian

Has this problem been eradicated? I have the same issue, I need the people I blocked to know I am not receiving their messages. At least an "unable to be sent" message, because even if I do unblock them even seconds after they send me a message that says delivered, I still NEVER get their message. It's not like the messages get stored somewhere like voicemail in "blocked voice messages." This should be implemented for text messages as well.

Jun 13, 2017 9:51 PM in response to gail from maine

Thank you gail from maine, that is very good advice. Never thought of that one. I was merely commenting on a comment. You should direct your response to the OP, albeit ancient history now, who was asking for advice on this, or if there was a mail rule that could be set to alleviate his issue that maybe someone knew about. Unfortunately no one ever responded with anything substantial. Until you came along.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

I WANT them to know they're blocked...

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.