What they do is come here to pick a fight knowing that we don't have enough points to report their posts. They instigate an argument and when we defend ourselves against the trolling, they report our posts to be deleted. Then they pretend to be the righteous ones. They didn't need to keep coming back here because they don't use the same tool. They know those of us who do were going to keep using it and keep asking for a solution, so they could've easily moved on and let us be. Now that iOS 9 has brought about these changes, they could easily go about their business and forget about this thread, but us little level 1's are easy targets, so they keep coming. Levels & points mean absolutely nothing to me. I see how the ones with higher levels & more points treat others in these forums and how they stick up for one another and boost each others' points, even when they're rude to people. They accuse us of posting "totally useless information," but what have they contributed for the last several pages of this thread that was helpful? Nothing. What really matters to me is how you carry yourself. I'll take a level 1 with no points who's helpful & courteous any day.
In the end, the ones who kept coming back here to tell us we're using the wrong tool, we're doing it wrong, and that Apple couldn't do what we were asking them to do...well, they were wrong. This thread and the feedback that many of us sent to Apple paid off. I'm happy to see they were listening and did something for us "lowly" Windows Explorer users.
At first I thought the 1969 date was just an oversight on Apple's part, but then I Googled it because it made me curious that they used such a precise date. My first guess was that it was related to Steve Jobs somehow. I think that would've been a nice nod if they had done something like that. The mentalfloss article I ended up linking to in my last post talks all about the Unix epoch date.
I have no problem keeping an eye on this thread until the OP marks it as solved just in case others come here looking for help and don't read past posts.
I wonder what determines how many DCIM folders we end up with after updating to iOS 9, because ARPU99 said they went from 39 folders to 22. Even 22 seems high because I went from over 40 down to 4. And I see where you went from 77 to 4 as well. I wonder why ARPU99 ended up with a different result?
mdrolle
wrote:
Hey ARPU99,
I did the test for you, got the results I expected.
Thanks for running the test for ARPU99. It's understandable why he/she didn't want to try it. Some people aren't comfortable with doing something like that and don't want to make things worse. There's nothing wrong with asking if anyone else wants to give it a go. Your results are what I expected too. I didn't expect the behavior of the transfer to change. It's just nice to see better organization.