kschaff11 wrote:
I'm still curious why the file itself is still so large.
I told you why in my previous post, but let me ellaborate just a bit.
A video is composed of thousands of frames, each one composed of millions of pixels.
Say you have one minute of 1080p video, at 30fps. That is 1800 frames, each one containing nearly 2 million pixels. If each pixel were to use 4 bytes (32 bits, 8 for each color plus alpha channel), that would add up to 14GB - remember we are talking of one MINUTE of video!
Obviously this cannot be. Video has to be COMPRESSED. There exist many different compression and decompression methods (or "codecs", which is a moniker for compressor/decompressor).
H264 is one of the most common, and produces relatively small files. It compresses both spatially and temporally: it takes advantage of the fact that parts of the image (like a static background) may stay the same from one frame to the next. H264 is the basis of most common cameras, and is the video codec behind AVCHD. It is used for recording and publishing because of the small size, for both storage and transmission.
On the other hand, the more compression is applied the more math is involved and the more your processor has to calculate in order to reproduce the video.
So for editing a heavily compressed codec like H264 is not best. ProRes is the professional family of codecs that is behind FCP X. ProRes files can be like 10 times larger than their H264 counterparts. They retain more quality as they are edited, and are easier on the processor.
If you export a file meant to be viewed, not edited further, export as H264 and it may be 5GB instead of 55 (or it can be even smaller if you downsize or reduce bitrate).
But you may also export a master in ProRes for safekeeping, lest you need it somewhere down the road for another project.