Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Hard Disk Drive Replacement Options

Hi:


I have a 2009 MacBook Pro. Recently it started acting funny and a friend suggested it might be the hard drive. I got a copy of Scannerz to check the drive and about 10 minutes into the scan it started finding problems. I ran Scannerz in diag mode to confirm it wasn't the SATA cable, and it passed that with flying colors. I need a new hard drive.


Here's my dilemma: I'm on a budget. The most I can afford is between $125 to $150 to replace the hard drive. The question is, can I get a decent SSD for this much money?


Before I continue, I should state that I use a dual boot system. I still have a 100GB partition with Snow Leopard on it because I have some old applications that are older PPC applications. They're rarely used, but they do get used a few times a year. The rest of the drive is Mavericks.


I see the following as possible options:

1. Get an SSD that I can split so that I have 2 partitions again. It would need to be at least 256GB, and that's probably pushing it, probably more like 350GB is what I'd like.


2. Just get a hard drive. I've read on here that some of the Hitachi drives are fast for old mechanical drives and they're cheap too. I'd have money left over.


3. Create a Fusion drive with a smallish SSD and a hard drive. Setting it up using an article I read about in CNET doesn't look that hard, but the idea of taking out the optical drive and putting some type of adapter in there to hold either an SSD or HDD just seems a little risky. Also, isn't the speed of the optical drive slower than those of drives? Do I need a new cable if I consider doing this?


4. The Scannerz tech support people said I might want to get a new SATA cable anyway. Any idea why they would say that? They don't sell parts so that obviously wasn't the motivation.


When answering, please keep costs in mind. The total I'm will to spend, absolute max, is $150.


Thank you.

MacBook Pro, OS X Mavericks (10.9.5), Hard Drive Replacement

Posted on Feb 17, 2015 5:42 PM

Reply
117 replies

Mar 21, 2016 10:36 AM in response to R.K.Orion

About the only way you could determine that would be to disassemble a number of SSDs and see whose SSD card layout, chips, and controllers are identical or near identical to those used in OWC. A long time ago I did EMI work and to evaluate sources of interference we had to disassemble units to get to the circuit boards. As an example, one ink jet printer being sold by HP, Tektronix, and Compaq (this was long before HP bought Compaq) were all identical, and all sourced from a manufacturer in Taiwan. All the manufacturers did was repackage the circuity and do their own manuals, drivers, etc.


Personally I would suspect one of the lesser known brands like Mushkin or Kingston, but there are so many cropping up it's hard to tell. With OWC having an annual income in the tens of millions of dollars and 137 employees, I doubt they have capability to do hardware development. They likely sought out someone that could do it for them or someone looking for business solicited them the idea. That doesn't mean it's bad, though. This is a frequent practice in manufacturing.

Mar 23, 2016 11:02 AM in response to ZV137

ZV137 wrote:


...Personally I would suspect one of the lesser known brands like Mushkin or Kingston, but there are so many cropping up it's hard to tell. With OWC having an annual income in the tens of millions of dollars and 137 employees, I doubt they have capability to do hardware development. They likely sought out someone that could do it for them or someone looking for business solicited them the idea. That doesn't mean it's bad, though. This is a frequent practice in manufacturing.


That's what I thought, and it makes sense. I always saw OWC as essentially a third party parts retailer, not designer or manufacturer.

Mar 25, 2016 11:01 AM in response to R.K.Orion

It's really most of them swapping out stuff like that. An HDD required dedicated facilities to make the actual parts because of the nature of the high precision electromechanical drive components. The same isn't true for SSDs. For example, SanDisk uses some of their own controllers, some SandForce controllers, and I think some others as well. OCZ uses a ton of different controllers, depending on the model number. Most of the "big" companies, like Intel, make and design their own.

Apr 3, 2016 12:10 PM in response to CaptH

This is a good example of what may go on in production:


http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/184253-ssd-shadiness-kingston-and-pny-caught- bait-and-switching-cheaper-components-after-good-reviews


If you read the article, especially the second paragraph on PNY, basically they completely changed the controller. On an SSD that's just about the equivalent of putting an entirely different SSD in.

Apr 6, 2016 11:10 AM in response to Grant Lenahan

One of the ways you may be able to tell if the company making an SSD is a "serious" player is whether or not they develop their own controllers. SanDisk, when they first entered the market started off using Marvel and Sandforce controllers, but now they apparently make their own. I would say they classify as a decent SSD maker as well, plus they're low in cost.

Apr 19, 2016 11:11 AM in response to ZV137

Another way to tell if an SSD player is "serious" is go to their web site and see how much information they have on their units. If all they have are a few brief tech notes they're likely nickel and dimeing it to save money, and my experience has been that if they're short on documentation, if you have problems they'll be short on skilled tech support too.

Apr 20, 2016 11:37 AM in response to ZV137

Some of the sale type websites allow you to filter SSDs based on the controller you use. Companies like Samsung, Intel, Crucial/Micron, Toshiba, and now even SanDisk will use their own. Some of these other companies are all over the place. OCZ for example, has used nearly every controller manufacturer to date. I assume since they're now owned by Toshiba that will stop. I'd just steer clear of some of these lesser known brands. They're probably just repackagers. It would also probably explain their poor documentation.

Apr 28, 2016 12:23 PM in response to ZV137

ZV137 wrote:


About the only way you could determine that would be to disassemble a number of SSDs and see whose SSD card layout, chips, and controllers are identical or near identical to those used in OWC. A long time ago I did EMI work and to evaluate sources of interference we had to disassemble units to get to the circuit boards. As an example, one ink jet printer being sold by HP, Tektronix, and Compaq (this was long before HP bought Compaq) were all identical, and all sourced from a manufacturer in Taiwan. All the manufacturers did was repackage the circuity and do their own manuals, drivers, etc.


Personally I would suspect one of the lesser known brands like Mushkin or Kingston, but there are so many cropping up it's hard to tell. With OWC having an annual income in the tens of millions of dollars and 137 employees, I doubt they have capability to do hardware development. They likely sought out someone that could do it for them or someone looking for business solicited them the idea. That doesn't mean it's bad, though. This is a frequent practice in manufacturing.


All they need to do is put an SSD in a different package or case. I doubt anyone would re-work a circuit board for the levels of sales OWC has. Not that their sales are bad, but companies like Toshiba, Intel, Samsung, etc. are multi-billion dollar companies. OWC is a tens of millions dollar company.

Hard Disk Drive Replacement Options

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.