swandy wrote:
Please don't quote me but I seem to remember another discussion about how much nickel was in the stainless steel and not sure where I read it (or where the person got his information) but it was said that the stainless steel that Apple is using is the same used for surgical instruments and knives and therefore should not pose any allergy problems. Again, don't remember the post or webpage where I read it, so take it with a grain of salt.
You read above in this very thread...
Lauri Mar 10, 2015 1:15 PM
Re: Is the Apple Watch Sport nickel free? in response to ILLYCIT Helpful
I also have a strong nickel allergy and want to know what's what before I buy.
I'm on the phone with Apple Support as I type this and she said if I have any issues like this I can call Support back and they will work it out with either a full refund or exchange for another band. The standard return policy is 14 days but she says for something like this they could work it out with me and it would be best to call Apple direct vs trying to return it at a store after 14 days.
I've never actually had a reaction to a watch back that was labelled stainless steel. It's always the buckle which is usually some plated gold tone crap. 316L stainless steel IS implant grade steel and from what I read even though it contains ~10% nickel if it's processed properly the nickel won't leech out. There's also the European prohibition of jewelry that causes nickel allergy reactions. I assume Apple looked into this since they will be selling the watch there.
I tend to give credence to Laurl as she has a strong allergy and is surely as good a Summary source as any. Looks like she did some homework before posting - although "Source citations" are always a very good practice - especially here with all the sticklers for protocol.
Good memory though, amigo!
ÇÇÇ