Yes, as I said, files can be recovered. I know all about that, it's the sheer amount of work required to restore 2 terabytes of data without file names, folders, organizational hierarchy, all because of 1 click:
I had just added two new 2 TB drives via an ExpressCard 34 USB 3.0 connection. I had renamed each disk, but, lesson learned, the names were too similar to my other drives.
For safety, I ran a repair on each new disk. With a minor problem found on the second disk, I proceeded by following the instructions given after a failed repair to do an erase/format. I have 2 monitors, and shift my gaze back and forth. Continuing with what I thought was the same disk, I proceeded, and looked at the confirmation message (with a drive name barely different than my others, but I hadn't switched drives).
In the same moment that I clicked "yes", I noticed that the number of drives in the left column of Disk Utility was noticeably reduced, looked over to the other monitor on the right and saw that both icons for the new drives were gone (with no 'bad disconnect' messages), and froze. In just the time it took me to look back at Disk Utility, it was done.
When the 2 new drives on the ExpressCard dropped, Disk Utility didn't go into a state where no drives were selected, it switched to select what was now the last drive in that left column: my 2 TB RAID 1 (mirrored) portion of my photo library -- 2 identical 2 TB copies (I was just beginning the steps to make a 3rd).
What astonishes me, with all the emphasis on multiple backups and redundancies, is that there is no fallback for the directory. Zero. Zip. The weakest link in the chain.
Imagine that you lose the one and only phone book for an entire metro area. All the homes and businesses are still there, but the address numbers, street names, and city, county, etc., to which they belong are no longer listed, and one must walk thru every block, street by street, to rebuild the one and only phone book.
Silly, and dare I say stupid to have only one phone book for such a huge population? One directory for huge amounts of data?
In order to have a copy of the directory, one must have a copy of the entire disk. With 8 TB disks and growing, that's a massive undertaking for what is relatively a very tiny amount of data.
Even if just one page of a phone book is torn out, %99.99999 is still accurate. Perhaps just a few bits of a data directory are changed; shouldn't it still be digestible by software to finesse a complete repair of the directory? After all, like the buildings, the data files haven't moved.
File this as: The Elephant In The Room (that no one sees).