Photos is poor replacement

I have a modest photo library of 22 thousand photos and find Photo to be a poor replacement for iPhoto. It doesn't have the features of iPhoto and the AppleScript support is very poor. It's essentially an iPad/iPhone app ported to OS X .


For example, I have a script to apply a keyword to the selected photo's. I select the photo's, run the script which presents a list of all the defined keywords, pick one and click on apply. Job done. You can't do any of this with Photos. There's no way to get a list of defined keywords. There's also no way of updating or adding GPS information. There's a long list of short comings for Photos as an OS X application.


Are there any other OS X alternatives? I need a photo manager program not an iPad app.


Andy

Posted on Apr 30, 2015 5:53 AM

Reply
15 replies

Apr 30, 2015 6:48 AM in response to Andy E

I fee l the same. No advice on alternatives, sorry. I changed from photoshop elements to iPhoto about 2 years ago and had a frightful transition but in the end was happy after lots of work from me. I feel like I am back at day one and the new program is not as user friendly as iPhoto. Locations, faces, merging and moving folders are all problems I've encountered after a few days, the list grows each day....Sigh...

Apr 30, 2015 6:57 AM in response to Andy E

For now continue using iphoto (or Aperture) they are in your applications folder and will work until some future OS upgrade breaks them


this is a how to use Photos forum - not a general photo manager for - there is a Digital Asset Manager (DAM) forum that discusses all DAMs


The most often mentioned one I see here is LightRoom although there are otheres


LN

Apr 30, 2015 7:06 AM in response to rayver

My library was built with iPhoto using the faces, events and smart albums. I also developed various AppleScripts to make life easier for bulk editing and exporting albums. So, on reflection I was using iPhoto as a photo manager with occasional use of the very basic photo editing features (straightening and red eye removal).


My point that iPhoto's replacement is just an iPad/iPhone app thats been ported to OS X still stands. It doesn't have the features of iPhoto and AppleScript support is very basic.

Apr 30, 2015 7:18 AM in response to Andy E

Andy E wrote:


I have a modest photo library of 22 thousand photos and find Photo to be a poor replacement for iPhoto. It doesn't have the features of iPhoto and the AppleScript support is very poor. It's essentially an iPad/iPhone app ported to OS X .


Are there any other OS X alternatives? I need a photo manager program not an iPad app.


Andy


Adobe Photoshop and Corel may have a product that suits your need.


Unfortunately Apple did not create a PDF/IBOOK downloadable manual for PHOTOS so you have to go through the online support pages to find out how to use - and where any bells and whistles went.


It looks like PHOTOS is set up for touch screens and no keyboard with Function keys.



photo getting started

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204655

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204410

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204264

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204414

Apr 30, 2015 8:03 AM in response to Csound1

"

Csound1Apr 30, 2015 6:46 AM Re: Photos is poor replacement
Re: Photos is poor replacementin response to Andy E

So you want an filing system rather than an editor."



Photos replaces both Aperture and iPhoto. Aperture is a an asset management tool first and editor second. iPhoto may be limited in both asset management and editing but at least you could use an external editor which you cannot with Photos.

Apr 30, 2015 10:15 AM in response to Andy E

For example, I have a script to apply a keyword to the selected photo's. I select the photo's, run the script which presents a list of all the defined keywords, pick one and click on apply. Job done. You can't do any of this with Photos. There's no way to get a list of defined keywords.

That's not true. Select the image you want to apply a keyword to and type Command+K to bring up the Keyword pane:

User uploaded file


If you want to assign multiple photos with the same or multiple keywords it's essentially the same:

User uploaded file

User uploaded file

Apr 30, 2015 11:35 AM in response to Csound1

IIt's just playing with words to say that Photos is not a replacement for Aperture. When Apple says they are not developing Aperture but you can migrate your Aperture library to Photos the.N it is implied that it is a replacement.


"“With the introduction of the new Photos app and iCloud Photo Library, enabling you to safely store all of your photos in iCloud and access them from anywhere, there will be no new development of Aperture. When Photos for OS X ships next year, users will be able to migrate their existing Aperture libraries to Photos for OS X,” reads a statement Apple released to Macworld."

Apr 30, 2015 2:36 PM in response to LarryHN

It's OK (for me) as an iPhoto replacement, but for serious pictures I have not converted from film. Digital pics tend to be more of the 'remember this' snapshot so I require little in the way of editing for those. Sometimes (usually an opportunistic shot) I will need more, then I use Photoshop. I have used Aperture and it was excellent, far above iPhoto or Photos, similar level to Photoshop. I also find Pixelmater very useful (along with 645Pro on the iPhone to take the shots with)

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Photos is poor replacement

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.