Yes, same here.
One question I have is, why does Apple Music rely on Genius or the same mechanism as Genius?
I for one do not appreciate "Genius" (ironic quotes) results and I would rather keep that option disabled within iTunes.
Why would Apple Music have to force iTunes users to enable Genius? It is a design flaw to not treat them as independent functionalities. If iTunes Match can exist independent of Apple Music, then why can Genius also not be independent?
If there are inherent flaws in Genius where it cannot handle a lot of tracks or duplicates, then why have it as a dependent process...?
In my view, Apple should just be simply uploading the equivalent of the iTunes Library*.* files and then processing them with algorithms based in the cloud, or offline. Why make the library integration more process more complicated than that for those who spend a lot of time organizing and rating songs within iTunes?
I represent the significant minority who have amassed a lot of music over the years. I've created hundreds of playlists and have > 80K tracks. To me, I would probably like to hear 80% of my own music and surf for 20% of unowned music. Apple Music seems to assume that most people have < 10 tracks personally and would be searching and playing from their library extensively (the reverse of the users with an extensive personal library use case).
So, the value of Apple Music, to me, is so I can access my/our playlists from all our apple devices and then add music (mine or apple library based) to those established playlists, probably more than creating new playlists. Unless this kind of 2-way replica updating can be done seamlessly and painlessly, I do not see Apple music going beyond the purchasing tipping point. Without adequate and reliable iTunes performance, the synergy between home and cloud cannot be achieved.
If this basic functionality is not resolved at the end of my 90-day trial, then farewell Apple Music.