I don't understand the OS X nomeclature

I feel like there may be some undocumented ways in which to classify the operating system. Is the first 10 in the version number sometimes skipped because it is redundant to the X? For instance, OS X 10.10.5, which seems to be the latest, I can't seem referred to very much in this site. I see a lot of references to OSX 10.5.8 and 6 but either these are very old versions or the first 10 is just not mentioned. If it is the latter, then I am completely baffled by the 8 or 6. I did a search on the way that App Expose works for me and I can't seem to find anything that matches.


Oh, yeah, and, then, there are the Lions and Leopards, and Tigers, etc. Is there any clear guide to these?


Is there a way to zero in on OS X 10.10.5?

Mac mini, OS X Yosemite (10.10.5)

Posted on Aug 22, 2015 6:07 PM

Reply
13 replies

Aug 22, 2015 6:17 PM in response to Whickwithy

There was an OS 9 before the transition to OS X. Before that, OS 7 and OS 8. But since the conversion to OS X the system has also used a numeric identifier.


10.x.y where the X is a major version, such as:


Tiger 4

Leopard 5

Snow Leopard 6

Lion 7

Mountain Lion 8

Mavericks 9

Yosemite 10


And then y is the sub version so we had


10.4.11, 10.5.8, 10.6.8, 10.7.5, 10.8.5, 10.9.5, 10.10.5 as the total versions within each Mac OS X.

Aug 22, 2015 6:22 PM in response to Whickwithy

Apple Support categorizes 10.10.x under Yosemite. You can see the name of your operating system when you go top "About this Mac" on your computer. And, the operating system version using numbers is always stated in full; not abbreviated.


For Yosemite related discussions go to:

OS X Yosemite


I did search on "expose in yosemite" and a whole list of discussions showed up:


https://discussions.apple.com/search.jspa?facet=content&type=discussion&sort=rel evanceDesc&showAnsweredFirst=true&q=expo…


And, remember that when people enter their new discussions, they may or not use Yosemite or 10.10.x in the subject or title; it is up to them not Apple Support.


I hope that helps.

Aug 23, 2015 5:43 AM in response to Ralph Landry1

Yeah, thanks for the ideas but I'm not sure that's going to be the best way for me. I take care of my own backups (though I may have to change that, under the circumstances and the Apple environment) so, really, I was just thinking of backing up the OS only, on its own memory stick and reloading it if I ever reach the point that the new OS is imploding on me. Call me paranoid but there is no way I am leaving the safety of my files to someone else. And, those Time Machine backups are insanely huge. But, that's another problem I've encountered. I don't even have Time Machine on and, yet, every storage device I have has something called backups that is exactly the same size and it keeps growing slowly (not too big, yet, like a GB) and I have no idea how to stop it!

Aug 23, 2015 8:44 AM in response to Whickwithy

Recovery HD partition has existed since Lion, 10.7, in the 2011-2012 time frame. Apple created the recovery HD partition as a means to reinstall the operating system rather than use DVDs packaged with a Mac. A large number of users lost/discarded those as soon as they opened the box. All Mac OS X versions from 10.7 through 10.10 have relied on recovery HD.

Aug 23, 2015 12:56 PM in response to Whickwithy

I found an answer that satisfies, finally, concerning how to backup OS X only and, yes, it uses Time Machine.


This seems like a really thorough site for questions on Time Machine and probably a lot of other things.


http://pondini.org/TM/10.html


I can set Time Machine up to not backup my files by deselecting various folders. All I really want is a backup of the next-to-latest OS X.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

I don't understand the OS X nomeclature

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.