an email from client manager of apple store provides the maintenance cost but does not provide the conclusion basis:
1. According to Apple's engieerer team's own conclusion, in a word- assumption: "There is a thump point inside the screen" -- Please provide photo or conclusion proof, as there is not any thump evidence on exterior shell and exterior screen. How can a customer give a thump on interior screen without any means to open up an integrated machine? Can the possibility of invisible hidden defficiency injured during the manufacturing process be excluded?
2. "Mesh shape divergent mark" -- This mark is the result, rather than the liability reason which leads to the result.
3. "Interior screen damage is confirmed not to fall within limited warranty scope for free maintenance." --As I emphasized for several times, this conclusion in not included in Apple's warranty clause. Any unexpected damage as usual usual using caused shall not be uncovered by warranty clause directly.
This case's focal point between "thump" and "responsibility". If Apple can't prove the "thump"'s happening is customer's "responsibility" directly, they can't refuse the warrany with their guessing.