Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

PC-8500 vs PC-12800 RAM on an older Macbook Pro

Hello, I have a MacBook Pro (15-inch, Mid 2010) 2.8 GHz, with 2x 2GB memory modules. The machine's maximum supported memory is PC-8500. I have tested it with PC-12800 and it works just fine.


I would like to ask, should I buy 2x 4GB PC-12800 memory instead of the PC-8500 memory, to use in my current Macbook Pro (with the purpose that in the future when I buy a newer Macbook model, I can use this PC-12800 that will be supported by the newer device)...


Do you think this PC-12800's higher CAS-latency of 11 will be visibly slower on my current Macbook Pro, compared to if it was with the PC-8500 modules with CAS-latency of 9?

MacBook Pro, OS X Yosemite (10.10.5), 15-inch, Mid 2010, 2.8 GHz

Posted on Sep 9, 2015 5:36 AM

Reply
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Posted on Sep 9, 2015 6:24 AM

in newer MacBook with replaceable RAM you can put 16Gb, i think you should’t think that you put this RAM in newer Mac

do not worry about speed, it will be not visibly slower

and buy RAM where you can easily return it – it’s not original RAM and Macs are very fussy about RAM

8 replies
Sort By: 
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Sep 9, 2015 6:24 AM in response to dobrinki

in newer MacBook with replaceable RAM you can put 16Gb, i think you should’t think that you put this RAM in newer Mac

do not worry about speed, it will be not visibly slower

and buy RAM where you can easily return it – it’s not original RAM and Macs are very fussy about RAM

Reply

Sep 12, 2015 3:02 AM in response to OGELTHORPE

Thanks.


A more general question would be, how much does the CAS latency affect the memory speed of any machine, not only MacBook, and not only Apple.


I.e. if the motherboard only supports up to PC3-8500 which is 1067 Mhz, will a memory module with PC3-12800 (which of course will work only at 1067 Mhz, not 1600 Mhz) perform slower than a PC3-8500 module due to the difference in latency (CL11 vs CL9)?

Reply

Sep 12, 2015 7:38 AM in response to Csound1

1) "The frequency of RAM is measured in megahertz and indicates the amount of data that can be moved to the memory stick at a time."


2) "Latency has more impact. Latency measures the delay before the RAM can achieve a specific task, and is displayed by a group of four timings, such as 6-8-7-12. In each case, the lower the number, the faster the performance."


So taking those two into account when putting a higher frequency memory (which of course has higher latency) on a lower frequency motherboard (which will limit the memory to work at this lower frequency), basically results in a poorer result.

However, you are probably right, that 2 ns cannot contribute to a noticable difference.


(All this was just me wondering why my Macbook works slower and heats so much. May be I should focus somewhere else, like changing the thermal paste of the CPU and GPU.)

Reply

Sep 12, 2015 8:30 AM in response to dobrinki

dobrinki wrote:


(All this was just me wondering why my Macbook works slower and heats so much. May be I should focus somewhere else, like changing the thermal paste of the CPU and GPU.)

Heat issues are far more likely due to the type and number of applications being used, possibly internal contamination of the MBP and sundry hardware problems. Thermal paste issues will be less of a likely cause for heat issues than the former. RAM is never a prime suspect.


Ciao.

Reply

PC-8500 vs PC-12800 RAM on an older Macbook Pro

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.