Do I need 4K and will my 2012 imac even work with it?

I want to buy a new camera for shooting video, up until now I was only looking at 1080P HD but now it seems there are a whole bunch of new camera's on the market offering 4K resolution. I am just wondering whether 4K is even necessary yet as most people don't have anything to view this on... 4K TV's are still very new and expensive. I have a 27" 2012 iMac fusion drive with 512MB video RAM and I am not sure whether this would be sufficient for working with 4K? I am not planning on changing my computer for at least two years so a 4K camera might be a waste of money. I have been looking at the Panasonic G7 or GH4 as possibilities both of which provide the option of 4K and 1080p. The other possible choices are something like a Canon 760D or 70D without 4K.

I don't want to end up with a camera that is out of date in a years time but equally don't want to end up with footage I can't edit on my current computer.

What is important is a camera that works well in low light as I want to make live music videos.

Any thoughts or advice would be appreciated.

iMac (27-inch, Late 2012), OS X Yosemite (10.10.2), null

Posted on Sep 14, 2015 11:28 AM

Reply
9 replies

Sep 14, 2015 11:49 AM in response to cedar23

If I had a choice between two camera of comparable quality and features – one of which was HD and the other UHD I would invest in the higher res camera (assuming it didn't break my budget). Two reasons: 1) more pixels mean more framing flexibility; I can zoom in crop, reposition for additional visual interest; 2) "future-proofing" footage…that is, giving me the ability to use this footage in future projects when 4K is the new norm or output a 4K version of today's project in the future without the quality hit it would take by up-scaling an HD version to UHD.


Also, people who know far more about camera than I'll ever know assert that 1080 that is re-sized from 4K is generally of higher quality than material that was shot in 1080.


Hopefully others will chime in with their thoughts on this,


Russ


edit: Yes, your 27" 2012 iMac will be OK – not fabulous, but OK.

Sep 15, 2015 11:43 AM in response to cedar23

a) your Mac will; read my specs: 30% of yours and happily handling 4k


b) 4k, here some non-scientific test; Hamlet, stagelight, 3-cam multicam;

User uploaded file

the schools own hmc70: shoulder mounted 'beast' to its time, 3CCD; fullHD50i, 17mbps and the automatic overwhelmed by dynamics.. yeah, you should fly manually under such light conditions, but the cams operator had never touched that dial ... noise in the darks… 'random' colors; close ups were fine ...



User uploaded file

my tiny sports-cam, hc v707 (US# 700); fullHD, 50p, 28mbps - another unmanned camera this evening, aside framing a fully accepatable pic; color needs some correction in post ..

and on the left side of stage, my beast&beauty (the cam! not the girl ...)


User uploaded file


This is recorded in 4k/25p, 100mbps, and my FCPX project is set to 1080/25, so cam pix downsampled

click pics for full-size, and in this case: just notice detail in cloth, skin tones etc etc ...

and me lazy: in full auto mode too .... 😉well, not 100% auto .... 90% ...


I dare to say: 4k cams are from the ground constructed for a new quality; as many say: not a delivery format for quiet a while but and excellent source material for 'standard HiDef' (have read that expression lately ... HighDef is meanwhile 'standard' LOL)


When you add a bit of pixie-dust (sharpen, curves) to those video-screengrabs (!!), pic quality is incredible...

User uploaded file

(click to enlarge)


No doubt, if budget allows it, jump to 4k; consider a device with 4:2:2 at hdmi; in 1-2years you could apply a Ninja recorder to grab the last grain of quality out of your pics ..... Your Mac needs only a few ext. usb3 drives, mechanically or SSDs

Sep 15, 2015 12:05 PM in response to cedar23

Thanks all, that's very helpful ( sorry.. I only seem to be able to mark two of you with the yellow starts for being helpful!)

In short does this mean that I should buy a 4K camera , shoot in 4K but downsample the footage to 1080HD until such time as I decide to buy a new Mac with enough spec to work with it? I am thinking either Panasonic GH4 or G7. I am loath to have to buy a new computer yet but this would at least be future proofing the camera for the next few years.

Also, what would actually happen if I tried to edit 4K on my current iMac? I already have a G-Tech USB 3 external drive 7200rpm that I use for extra storage, should I be using that to work from in FCP? I always thought the internal drive would be better so I keep my FCPX libraries on that. If necessaryI don't mind at this stage buying a faster external drive if that helps me to carry on using this computer for a bit longer.

Sep 15, 2015 10:46 PM in response to cedar23

cedar23 wrote:

… does this mean that …

No.

First line in my lengthy reply:

Your actual Mac handles 4k fine, if, if you use at last one additional, external drive for the Events/'source' files ...


That's all the 'magic' handling 4k ... on a Mac.

At fcp.co, other MacMini Users report, they handle 4k, like me, on that tiny Tubberware Box = a Mini is LESS powerful than your actuall Mac!


I don't say, recommended for daily, on the minute professional, commercial use.

If I would get paid for my editing, I would buy me a 5k iMac ... 😉


… and an external, TB-connected überRaid ... LOL

Sep 19, 2015 2:39 AM in response to Karsten Schlüter

Sorry if I'm being a bit dim here but I'm not sure why I would need to buy an additional external drive? Is this because I would need a better/faster drive than the internal fusion drive or because it works better if you edit from an external drive with 4K? Are you saying that for instance an external SSD drive would help with 4K rather than importing the source file onto the internal drive. Would a 7200 USB3 be ok as I already have one.

Basically I just need to understand what I need to have/ buy in order to be able to go out and buy a new camera and continue working on my current iMac for now. I have installed more RAM, now have 24G.

Sep 19, 2015 1:13 PM in response to cedar23

cedar23 wrote:

....Are you saying that for instance an external SSD drive would help with 4K rather than importing the source file onto the internal drive. Would a 7200 USB3 be ok as I already have one.....

in short: Yes. And yes.



On a normal day, sitting at your Mac…

• your system is busy - and it uses the internal drive to read and write data, some are invisible (swaps) but >1GBs

• your app(s) is busy (with itself,e.g. managing/indexing your Events) - and they use the internal drive to read and write data

• FCPX is busy read/write the Project

• FCPX is busy generating&reading all sorts of cached data, or 'stuff' like audio waveforms

• finally, FCPX has a high demand of a constant streams of data video - huge streams, they scale by used formats


on a very reduced level of engineering we observe 5 sorts of data-streams - all from and to one drive? ; and the one stream with 4k is huge, while watching a simple disssolve you have TWO streams of 4k; creating a compound with 3 clips as a cut-away and watching it asks for four simultanous delivered streams.... are you still convinced, a single internal drive (you play music while editing? check emails? download pics from the cloud....), A Fusion Drive is capable to deliver and receive/write this amount of bits'n bytes?


The speed-tolol with most renommeé is Black Magic Speed Test; aside speed it lists 'best practice values for diff. video formts/codecs'.

This is speed of one of my average usb3 drives:

User uploaded file

<click to enlarge>


"Will it work" claims, its good for NTSC/PAL, but even 720/30p could create stutter… (real-life performance differs: this drive handles 1080/50p fine...


Next, my Raido-0:

User uploaded file

twice the speed (reading) ... the green checkmarks go up to 1080/60i (real life higher...


an ext.SSD, here my small Samsung SSD performs as...


User uploaded file

almost beyond scale, >400mbps

all tests performed direct usb3-connected to MacMini


If you don't trust my very rural experience, listen to expert Larry Jordan

https://larryjordan.com/articles/fcp-x-v-10-1-media-management-collection/?utm_s ource=Larry%2527s%20Newsletter%20-%20140…

(a list to several articles explaining this issue)


or the other usual supects, some participating here on this board

Tom Wolsky http://www.fcpxbook.com/articles/managed-and-external-media.html

Ben Balser (oops, just realizing my link list is old.... )


plus: you need tons of GBs for storing clones of your SDcards, finished play-out projects, 'media' in general, music, graphics, animations, photos, movies............. and of course: backups....

Your question why you should need an external drive, could be answered:

you're right, one is by far not enough, should be at last three extHDD..... 😉



tl;dr:

rule of thumb: one 'platter*' per 'stream**' = flawless handling even of 4k-Multicam on a tiny, old MacMini ....


* platter=individual media; not a partitioned drive; or SSD, allthough no mechanical platters involved

** stream=sources, but the project itself counts as a 'stream' too

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Do I need 4K and will my 2012 imac even work with it?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.