-
All replies
-
Helpful answers
-
Dec 27, 2015 3:33 PM in response to Dave Thewlisby William Lloyd,Generally, when you migrate an Aperture library to an Photos library it won't require that much extra space. This is because it uses 'hard links' to not have to copy the masters. So they won't actually be duplicated on disk, though Photos will generate its own thumbnails and previews.
So with a 1.8 TB library on a 2 TB drive, it _might_ be possible to do the migration, but it's close enough that it's maybe dangerous to try. I did successfully do the migration with a 750 GB Aperture library on a 1 TB drive, FWIW.
I don't know how to specify a different location of the library you migrate. But it might be possible to create a new Photos library on an external drive, then open it, and try importing your old Aperture library?
-
Dec 27, 2015 3:57 PM in response to William Lloydby Dave Thewlis,Unfortunately the process for importing an Aperture library isn't done to an existing library at all. Photos creates a new library in the same folder as the Aperture library being migrated and with a variant name, and does the migration into it. There doesn't seem to be any way to affect this at least that I can find.
Allegedly Photos will copy managed masters rather than creating hard links if the Aperture library is resident on an external drive (I'd understood that this would happen if it was simply on a different drive than the new Photos library, but as I said there doesn't seem to be a way to do that).