-
All replies
-
Helpful answers
-
Jun 9, 2016 4:36 PM in response to SergZakby bobseufert,Aloha SergZak.
Please don't start going wobbley on me now, I need your help. Make a list of things you want changed and add to it when you find things.. I'm taking all of this upstairs. I can't promise you anything other then your voice will be heard.
Thank you. Bob.
-
Jun 9, 2016 6:10 PM in response to bobseufertby elcpu,bobseufert wrote:
I'm taking all of this upstairs. I can't promise you anything other than your voice will be heard.
Thank you. Bob.
Aloha Bob,
You are too kind and trying too hard. You did not create this new style. You have already pointed the "upstairs" here. Others have done the same in "different locations" as you know. It is the "upstairs" job to proceed or not. Just enjoy that wonderful Hawaii weather you were telling me about a day or so ago.
Best regards, elcpu.
-
Jun 9, 2016 6:13 PM in response to bobseufertby dianeoforegon,This is beyond awful. I have a 27" retina screen and the text is so big I have to scroll to view taking much longer to read a post. The new text coloring is making my eyes water trying to read. I'm not a 20 yo with great eyesight.
Right now it's not functional.
-
Jun 9, 2016 6:16 PM in response to dianeoforegonby elcpu,Look what it did in my reply to Bob above. I quoted what he had said and it made the font super tiny. Some of these things are elementary and should have been tested before release.
-
-
Jun 9, 2016 9:09 PM in response to bobseufertby Ziatron,The changes were predictable.
1) Make a desktop computer look like an iPhone or iPad.
2) Pretty is more important than functional.
-
Jun 10, 2016 1:49 AM in response to bobseufertby RebekkahRoseRyan,I am having so much difficulty seeing this content after the redesign! Too much white, print too tiny, even clicking on a tiny print area doesn't blow it up enough for my 66 year old eyes to be able to read without my magnifying glass. I used to enjoy learning from these posts, but I will have to avoid them from now on. My eyes are so tired from the brightness that I am unable to continue to do my work that is necessary.
-
Jun 10, 2016 2:05 AM in response to RebekkahRoseRyanby bobseufert,Thank you. A lot of people are mentioning the faint font, hopefully that's first to go.
I'm trying different font sizes from the advanced editor to see if that makes a difference.
Edit, I do like that 14 pt font.
-
by seventy one,Jun 10, 2016 2:04 AM in response to RebekkahRoseRyan
seventy one
Jun 10, 2016 2:04 AM
in response to RebekkahRoseRyan
Level 6 (15,140 points)
PeripheralsHello Rose,
I complained about this within minutes of the new format being launched. I get the feeling that people are working on this but it may be a while before it is finalised. There have been ideas already published by the more knowledgeable amongst us but as I see it, the suggestions are quite complex.
-
Jun 10, 2016 2:09 AM in response to dianeoforegonby turingtest2,dianeoforegon wrote:
This is beyond awful. I have a 27" retina screen and the text is so big I have to scroll to view taking much longer to read a post. The new text coloring is making my eyes water trying to read. I'm not a 20 yo with great eyesight.
Right now it's not functional.
While we wait for change try these Minimal CSS tweaks for ASC which will give you control over font size, weight and color.
tt2
-
Jun 10, 2016 2:08 AM in response to seventy oneby bobseufert,What's going on here ? I enlarged my font to 14 and it appears no bigger then yours.
-
Jun 10, 2016 2:11 AM in response to bobseufertby turingtest2,bobseufert wrote:
What's going on here ? I enlarged my font to 14 and it appears no bigger then yours.
The base font size in the new design is 22px.
tt2
-
-
Jun 10, 2016 2:14 AM in response to turingtest2by bobseufert,Using the editot what does that mean please ? I only see 10, 12, 14, etc. When I tried 14 it made the 10 smaller.
-
Jun 10, 2016 2:22 AM in response to bobseufertby bobseufert,I see my mistake. 10 isn't the base. Thank you.
Oh great now10 is full size. I got a headache.
