-
All replies
-
Helpful answers
-
-
Jun 17, 2016 12:30 PM in response to rccharlesby rccharles,You can act more quickly than Apple will. You can see by applying the css fixes that the fix are available and easy to install yet Apple has not implemented them.
Apple indicates they will be making more changes. They want to move to making smaller changes, but making the changes more quickly.
I do not know how much they acknowledges the user experience difficulties users are experiencing. Apple acknowledges that the user are experiencing difficulties with the new design. They have not listed what they believe these difficulties are in the user interface design. They cite one bug fix they have made and mention that they will be making more fixes. Apple cites three things they will be fixing. I'd classify them as bug fixes to the current design.
R
-
Jun 17, 2016 1:53 PM in response to rccharlesby ChitlinsCC,Speaking bug fixes...
Attempt to compare versions of a user tip OR view changes(NEW) to a single version (from it immediate predecessor?)
I get an error trying to do this on my own authored tip in ES-ASC (never went live) - much less compare anyone else's
EDITadded
This has been reported to engineering since early(?) May
-
-
-
-
-
Jun 19, 2016 11:30 AM in response to ChitlinsCCby rccharles,Of course, the fact that people are experiencing eye strain and the fix is known shouldn't be a worry. I can deal with tiny_mce.
just force the advanced editor til things are sorted out.
r
ps. the simple editor ends up in html mode. General comment, why in the world would you put html in the simple mode when it is working?
-
-
-
Jun 19, 2016 12:29 PM in response to rccharlesby ChitlinsCC,I am not sure that "Jake" has been made fully aware of the issue that you are having
(I had it repeatedly on one occasion... 4th or 5th try the SimpleEd loaded - has not happened since - I am exclusively FF 47.0 Win10 with 'several' add-ons enabled)
You likely would have best luck raising the issue "upstairs"
IMHO, I do NOT believe CSS invoked would have any effect, but possible(?)
What is happening to you:
- Hit [Reply]
- a bunch of javascript is
- requested from server
- is delivered to your computer/browser
- your browser "runs" the script and does not Completely Finish
You MAY be able to see what part fails by running FF's Web Developer "Debugger" (shows what is successful, cautioned and stopped, neatly color-coded)
-
Jun 20, 2016 1:42 PM in response to ChitlinsCCby rccharles,The "upstairs" is aware of the problem with loading simple edit. There has been a lot of commenting on it. R -
Jun 20, 2016 2:13 PM in response to rccharlesby ChitlinsCC,In ES-ASC, early on (they started with this format), I was able to participate in a threaded view (not FLAT pref) 'conversation' that 'tiered' enough where the toolbar of the Simple editor got all "mushed together". That alarmed Vicky (ES Manager) enough to kick that upstairs that day.
I keep a lot of screenshots, but apparently not that one.
In practice, that result is VERY hard to do, and even harder to find where it happened because, at some point, the thread goes multi-page which is all FLAT from then on.
Imagine a reply PANE to this post somewhere between 33% and 50% of the width... there is just NO ROOM for this in half the horizontal space






