Best computer 2.1 speaker system for mixing audio?

I'm thinking Altec Lansing, Bose, Jamo...That kind of speakers, with 2 satellites and one sub. Not interested in Genelecs, Dynaudio, or anything in that price range. However, is there a computer speaker system that you guys think is the best for audio mixing (and listening in general)?

I kinda like the Altec Lansing system with the two long aluminium satellite sticks, and the Bose looks hot too, but the sound?...I'm a bit scheptical about Bose because they're reknown for a sound "that envelops you", ie not directional, seemingly coming from all over the place (by using sound reflected from the walls). Even the iPod hifi is not bad, I reckon..Kinda like the modern Auratones...Any suggestions?

BTW, I'm posting in this forum because I want advice from people involved in producing and mixing music.

A.

MacBook Pro 2.16Mhz, 2 Gig RAM, Mac OS X (10.4.8), LogicPro 7.2.3, Reason v3, Stylus RMX, 23" Cinema Display

Posted on Dec 5, 2006 7:39 AM

Reply
14 replies

Dec 7, 2006 4:18 PM in response to Wayne Anthony-Cole

Bose is really a lot of marketing hype. Before I got into music production I was into Hi-Fi home theater systems. While Bose makes a killing saying its sound "envelopes" you, in these "miraculously" tiny speakers, it's completely untrue. The drivers were pretty bad, and their $2000 systems would be on par with $300 systems by other brands.

When you're setting up a system, especially for mixing audio, you don't want "reflections" off walls. Professional studios spend thousands of dollars on construction and sound reinforcement to get rid of them. Ideally, you'd want a clear, precise, distinct sound, and reflections muddy up all of that up.

As for recommendations, the Blue Sky Media desk is nice. I demoed it before deciding on going with my Dynaudios, which were only a few hundred $ more.

Also, do you really need the subwoofer?

There are 2.0 systems out there that go really low. If you're used to small cones, like those commonly found on computer speakers (2-3") then that's where the subwoofer comes into play, but on 2.0 audio monitors, small drivers are at least 6", and 8" drivers are the same size as sufwoofer cones on computer systems. I mix on my Dynaudio BM5A's and I find it covers all but the very low subbasses very well.

Anyway, what is your primary use for these?

If you're looking to semi-seriously mix audio, then go with audio monitors. There are cheap options out there (KRK, M-Audio, Blue Sky, Behringer) that handle mixing and are 2.0 (usually cheaper than 2.1). I've personally found to prefer a good 2.0 setup over a 2.1 system.

If you're looking for something mainly to enjoy music and play games, then go with something like a Klipsch system. Probably cheaper overall and Klipsch makes fine systems.

Feb 23, 2007 9:35 AM in response to Ant1

For the amount you'd spend on a decent 2.1 desktop system, why not get some entry level near-field monitors and do your production work the justice it deserves?

For about the same price as a 2.1 system like you're talking about, you can get a decent set of active KRKs or something similar.

Monitor the sound as true as you possibly can. Artificial boosts and cuts from a 2.1 desktop system like you are talking about are only going to hurt your work.

Feb 23, 2007 9:44 AM in response to Brent Meyer

what do you need the speakers for? are they to compliment studio monitors you already have? if not, it's pretty much a bad idea in every way to choose any brand of home or multimedia speakers over an affordable pair designed for audio production.

if budget is the only reason why you're thinking this way, then there are plenty of other options before you need to be scared off by the price of genelecs..

KRK make a series of smaller powered monitors that are pretty good for the money. the smallest pair are not even $AU200 more than what I paid for my AKG headphones..

this market is so competitive nowadays there's no reason why you should settle for speakers that are made to look nice in a room and enhance the sound to provide an exciting listening experience for home users, and to sell themselves in a domestic hifi showroom. you should buy the right tools for the job, otherwise you may as well have bought a sewing machine to run logic on as well.

Feb 23, 2007 12:32 PM in response to tbirdparis

Actually I was looking at a few reviews of the Genelecs and someone was compairing them to the Blue Sky Media's, that's the only reason I'm asking, more out of curiosity than anything. I must admit that I haven't given the KRK's much more than a passing look but maybe I'll try to get a listen. I'm a bit of a Dynaudio fan but the compact size of the Genelecs appeals.

They're for nearfield and I'd rather not go too big.

I took my Yamaha NS10's out and shot them so I'm currently monitor-less.

Feb 23, 2007 2:58 PM in response to Ant1

I'd rather pick the setup without a subwoofer if I want it for mixing in stereo.
Some nice near/mid fields with good low freq response. With subwoofer more problems have to be solved (not only room treatment-hemholtz resonators and other bass/mid traps depending on the size of the room but finding a proper placement for a subwoofer might be not easy as well - again, it depends on available space... and I suggest you to read Bob Katz's briliant explanation why two subwoofers are better than one 🙂
Forget "hi-fi" (they are mostly very "lo-fi" in fact) systems as main speakers for mixing, as you probably want your mixes to translate well on other systems (than they are mixed on) as well - and mixing on those "computer" or "home cinema" systems might be quite dangerous...

Feb 23, 2007 4:08 PM in response to Ant1

repeated note to all desktop audio fans:

computer speakers and/or small two way bookshelves are not good enough to mix with.
use them at your own artistic risk.
good monitors must produce a spl of 85db from ~40-20,000 cycles per second to be even adequate.
if you've never heard your projects thru studio monitors, or have never worked in pro performance audio you will be working at a handicap with these speaker types.
the human body loves to get a little physical impact from low end audio.
these types of speakers do not supply this at all. they do not move enought air over the full frequency spectrum.

my advice to everyone wanting decent monitoring is to save your money up and buy matched pair monitors with at least a 10" bass driver and an average spl of over 90db.

Feb 23, 2007 4:29 PM in response to Ant1

here's the DL friends - if you want to mix sound, then don't use computer speakers. . . at least not solely. It is good to have a set of consumer grade, sh** speakers lying around the control room, so that you can hear how you mix will sound on what the general public unfortunately listens to most of their music on. a pair of computer speakers, a pair of bookshelf speakers (which, after checking frequencies, compression, EQ and all that good stuff, is what I do most of my actual mixing on) and of course, your studio monitors. I would NOT buy computer speakers as your first investment for mixing audio

2 and 3 inch cones NEED a subwoofer because they are garbage. . . they can't put out decent sound worth anything. Most of the sound comes from the subwoofer. If you can't get studio monitors (and don't go cheap, cuz you'll regret it) then at least get some consumer bookshelves or something. . . something with a 4.5 - 8 inch woofer. . . just NOT computer speakers as your first choice for mixing ANYTHING.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Best computer 2.1 speaker system for mixing audio?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.