Of course! How silly of me. Clearly it's much better to carry around 2 pair of identical headphones and pay $200 for them, in order to use one $100 pair with an iPhone, and the other pair with a Mac. ;-)
I agree on the convenience of BT headphones. I've been using them for almost a decade without any complaints, in non-critical listening situations. I still prefer to conduct important business and personal calls on wired headphones, and until Beats or Apple offers noise isolating wireless earbuds, these are going to still be a go-to solution. There's obviously a significant market for them, and at $100 a pair, they're not cheap EarPods given away for free with the iPhone. If I'm going to invest $100 in a pair of earbuds, when the AirPods are not that much more expensive, then sound quality must be factored into this for customers. For my money, instead of carrying around two pair of earbuds to address different equipment, I'd rather spend the same money or less on one pair of Lightning earbuds and an adapter that let me use it on more than the iPhone. At present, I see no compelling reason to spend the same money as the 3.5mm earbuds, on a pair of Lightning earbuds which can only be used on iOS devices, and nothing else; just to eliminate a $10 adapter, given away free with new iPhones. Seems like a weird marketing move for Beats. If there's finally an adapter coming for Lightning headphones, it makes more sense to me. I guess we'll see.