-
All replies
-
Helpful answers
-
Sep 15, 2016 11:20 AM in response to jatsir96by OGELTHORPE,The most obvious difference is that the current 2015 year models have retina displays, the 2012 does not. At the present time, the 2012 model can accept 2 TB storage SSDs, the 2015 models do not have that option, yet. As you know, video takes a lot of space and that may be important for you.
Ciao.
-
Sep 18, 2016 6:06 AM in response to OGELTHORPEby jatsir96,Thanks Ciao. Your opinion help me to choose the right product.
-
Sep 18, 2016 7:16 AM in response to jatsir96by Michael Black,The 2015 model also uses an updated PCIe SSD with more bandwidth, so there is a significant performance boost over previous models by that alone (reportedly roughly twice the read/write throughout if previous models). So maybe your choice comes down to maximize internal storage, or go for performance and expand external storage with thunderbolt drives?
-
Sep 18, 2016 7:17 AM in response to jatsir96by spaceisstrange,I'd totally go for the 2015 one. The screen really makes a difference between the two and as Michael says the SSD that the 2015 uses it's a PCIe one.
-
Sep 18, 2016 9:07 AM in response to jatsir96by OGELTHORPE,I am pleased to have been helpful.
Ciao.
-
Sep 18, 2016 9:17 AM in response to jatsir96by leroydouglas,I would not buy a 2012 at this point in time.
Future proof your purchase with a 2015. I would max out the RAM and as much SSD as you need/afford.